How is an appeals court different then a traditional federal court?

2 answers:

7 0

The answer is D. There are more chances to be heard at an appeals court.

The main difference between the two is that at an appeals court cases can be appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court if one of the parties disagrees on the decision. When a case is appealed, no new evidence can be presented. The new judge just takes note of the evidence presented at the original trial. For federal courts, cases are presented for the first time.

Otrada [13]3 years ago

7 0

Answer:

There are three justices in an appeals court.

Explanation:

trust me

You might be interested in

Marlowe is a customer at General Store. He is injured while attempting to lift a heavy lawn ornament off of a display shelf at t

iogann1982 [59]

Answer:Depositions

Explanation:

If Marlowe wishes to obtain written answers to questions from General Store's manager about the condition of the display case then the Deposition recovery process is appropriate.

A deposition is a pre-trial phase in a lawsuit in which both parties investigates about the case under the rule and regulations. They collect evidence supporting their claims by questioning other party and others by means of discovery devices like a request for the production of the necessary document and things.

7 0

3 years ago

A region's main roads are related to its physical features. true or false

7nadin3 [17]

True, they’re related

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

“if jesus had stayed away from jerusalem he would not have to suffer and die as he did” what are reasons for and against this st

valkas [14]

Answer:

When jesus went to jerusalem he was tried and found guilty before pontius pilate which is the reason he suffered

7 0

3 years ago

Compensation where the top performer receives much higher rewards than other competitors, even if the others perform at only sli

Nina [5.8K]

<span>The correct answer is C. Tournament pay :)</span>

3 0

3 years ago

Why do you think many Israelis oppose giving up settlements and occupied lands in the West Bank and the Gaza Strip?

astra-53 [7]

Answer:

I think many Israelis oppose giving up settlements and occupied lands in the West Bank and the Gaza Strip because, settlements make what Israelis and Palestinians call "new realities on the ground." Palestinian people group are part separated and their association with the land debilitated, while Jewish people group put down roots in an area implied for Palestinians. As a result, it obscures or obliges the limits of any future Palestinian state. For certain pilgrims, this is the point: they need the West Bank a completely fused as Israeli area and are attempting to get that going.

Explanation:

This is what I put and got it correct lol.. copy+paste It went through a paraphrasing tool sooooo.

3 0

3 years ago