All categories

3 years ago

How is an appeals court different then a traditional federal court?

2 answers:

7 0

The answer is D. There are more chances to be heard at an appeals court.

The main difference between the two is that at an appeals court cases can be appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court if one of the parties disagrees on the decision. When a case is appealed, no new evidence can be presented. The new judge just takes note of the evidence presented at the original trial. For federal courts, cases are presented for the first time.

Otrada [13]3 years ago

7 0

Answer:

There are three justices in an appeals court.

Explanation:

trust me

You might be interested in

I WILL GIVE YOU A BRAINLIEST! Do you think most modern Americans would approve or disapprove of the twelve tables as a system of

Naddika [18.5K]

Answer: Yes, I think most modern Americans will approve of the Twelve Tables, although some may disapprove.

Explanation: The Twelve Tables were a set of laws inscribed on 12 bronze tablets created in ancient Rome in 451 and 450 BCE. They were the first set of laws leading to a new approach to laws where they would be passed by government and written down so that all citizens might be treated equally before them. The Twelve Tables gave every Roman citizen and non-citizen a life with equality and rights.

6 0

3 years ago

What was the role of women in Egyptian sociey

nika2105 [10]

Unlike other ancient societies, Egyptian women were free to choose the men they married and they could also divorce their husbands. Marriage was very important to Egyptians, love and affection between a husband and wife was important, and to all classes of Egyptians, marriage was the normal.

5 0

3 years ago

In the early part of the past century, psychologists who broke down thought processes into their basic elements and analyzed the

likoan [24]

Answer:

Gestalt

Explanation:

Gestalt psychology was founded by Kohlar, Koffa, and Wertheimer. Gestalt means whole, placed together, put together. This school of psychology focused on the behavior and mind of the human being as a whole. Gestalt psychologists focused on human whole behavior rather than its sub-parts or components. Instead of that, we focus on the wholeness of things rather than its parts.

Gestalt principle
Closeness
Proximity
Continuation
Similarity
Figure and ground

4 0

3 years ago

If a plaintiff feels that individual acts of intentional discrimination in his firm have led to a statistical disparity in the f

Ulleksa [173]

Answer: pattern or practice lawsuit

Explanation:

Pattern or practice case

This is a case whereby the plaintiff tries to show in court that they have been subjected into discriminatory situations which were committed by the defendant.

The plaintiff shows that the policies and procedures were actual used in committing such a discriminatory act towards them.

This case comprises discrimination of the following nature :

Housing discrimination

School segregation

Employment discrimination

A plaintiff will be required to provide evidence or any proof that shows that the defendant behaviour is actual an ongoing practice.

3 0

4 years ago

Explain how Emperor Justinian adapted Roman law for use by the Byzantines.

Alenkinab [10]

The way Emperor Justinian adapted Roman law for use by the Byzantines:

The Corpus Juris Civilis, also known as Justinian Code in Renaissance, was commissioned by Justinian.

The Corpus Juris Civilis had four parts:

The Codex collected a selection of colonial statutes dating back to those days of Hadrian.
The Digesta had been an anthology of 50 novels of fragments and journals by the most influential scholars of Roman history. These writings have been private thoughts.
The institutions consisted of four pupil textbooks which, compared to the other two parts, introduced lawful conceptual aspects in a less developed way.
The Novellae was a series of laws enacted by Justinian from the printing of the Corpus to his demise.

The research aimed at reorganizing the judicial system of the Empire that has become dysfunctional over time, at opposing obsolete laws and those that have been abolished, and at changing the ambiguous passages.

At its release in 529, the first was redundant because it covered acts already redundant and it didn't contain acts published in the meanwhile. This version has already been destroyed. The second book was published in 534.

4 0

3 years ago