The argument was about whether slaves would count as part of the population. The population affected how many seats the states got in the house. Southern states wanted them to count (more slaves were owned here) and Northern states did not want them to count (lesser slaves were owned here). Eventually they decided to count each slave as 3/5th of a citizen.
btw i might have mixed the north and south up so make sure you double check that online lol
The Answer is Face Validity .
Face Validity also called as Logical Validity, is a simple form of Validity where you apply subjective assessment of whether or not your study or test measure what it is supposed to measure .
Answer:
Many decisions are taken at the margin
Explanation:
Many decision are taken at the margin.
He makes small changes at the margin in the number of hours spent training on each activity.
Paola and his wife both realise that increasing time spend in the pool will decrease his total triathlon time.
His time is fixed (20hrs) and anytime he wants to spend extra on one activity, i means that he cannot spend time on another (this is known as opportunity cost).
They are both on the same page in terms of trying to improve Paolo's total time (exploiting opportunities to makes themselves better off).
1hour switch in Paolo's point of view isa major change, whereas his wife recommends a wholesale change.
Paolo realises that as he spends more time in the pool improving his swim time, his run and cycle times will take a hit. As he swims more, his improvement is likely to slow down, while spending less time on cycling and running will cost him more in terms of time.
Hence Paolo is looking at the margins.
His wife on the other hand, is not, she is ignoring the interaction, may be forgetting the ncreasing deterioration in terms of time of the other 2 legs
They helped reduce prices and made farming easier. the prices of slaves reduced allowing the South's economy to be stronger
