La paradoja en la democracia de Ecuador es que a pesar de que existe un sistema democrático muchos sectores no están representados dentro de la política, está paradoja podría ser superada si existe mayor participación política.
Una paradoja se refiere a una situación que resulta contradictoria o que no parece lógica. En la frase de José Mujica se explica una paradoja pues el manifiesta que a pesar de sus intentos fallidos por cambiar el mundo, el creyendo que vale la pena luchar, lo cuál es contradictorio.
De forma similar, la democracia de Ecuador tiene paradojas o es contradictoria. Una de las mayores contradicciones es que la democracia debe representar la voz del pueblo y sin embargo, muchos sectores no se siente representados.
En este sentido sectores como las comunidades LGBTI o los campesinos tienen poca participación política debido a la predominancia de sectores políticos tradicionales.
Por otra parte, está paradoja puede ser superada si se incluye a los sectores excluidos dentro de la política. De forma que todos los sectores tengan voz política y realmente exista una democracia.
Aprenda más en: brainly.com/question/21614811
Answer:
Over the next several years, Jackson seized millions of acres of Indian lands in the southeast, eventually removing five Indian nations from their homes. As a result of the removals, these lands were opened to settlement and the establishment of new cotton plantations. Although some Indian nations chose to fight, in the end, most of the population was removed. The U.S. Army forcibly removed more than 15,000 Cherokees and marched them westward to "Indian Territory" in Oklahoma, a journey the Cherokee called the "Trail of Tears." As many as a quarter of the Indians died during the forced march, and the $6 million cost of the removal was deducted from the $9 million offered them for their land in the treaty they were forced to sign. The Removal Act of 1830 guaranteed the Indians lands in the west, but these promises were later broken.
Explanation:
hope it helps :)
I believe the answer is: <span>attribution theory of leadership
</span><span>attribution theory of leadership view that a leader is a status that granted for an individual with the acknowledgement of other members in the group.
</span>This theory operates on the assumption that leaders are always obtaining mutual respect from the group members (not appointed through nepotism)
The answer to the question about why would nationalism lead to intolerance and persecution of other ethnic or national groups is explained below.
Explanation:
When a nation promotes its own interests, over the interests of other nations, it is called as nationalism. Nationalism creates a feeling of inferiority within the minorities of a country, which may lead to intolerance among them.
Countries usually contain diverse group of people, who are from different backgrounds, ethnicity, etc. Large group of people in a country or region creates pride among them of their sharing of common heritage, history, backgrounds, ethnicity, etc. This thing may leave many minorities alone and make them feel inferior in the same region or country, which would no doubt lead to intolerance among them.
Learn more about nationalism at:
brainly.com/question/135146
#LearnWithBrainly
President Lyndon B. Johnson<span> was the president that launched a war on poverty in aim to create a great society.</span>
