C is the answer I think♀️
Answer:
Governments can intervene to provide a basic security net – unemployment benefit, minimum income for those who are sick and disabled. This increases net economic welfare and enables individuals to escape the worst poverty. This government intervention can also prevent social unrest from extremes of inequality.
Based on statistics, only 1% (one percent) of the population owns half of the wealth in the world.
<h3>How is wealth distributed in the population of the world?</h3>
Unfortunately, wealth is not equally distributed in the population of the world. This means many people have limited resources, while only a small percentage of the people own most of the wealth available. This problem is known as inequality and is often related to other issues such as:
- Poverty.
- Lack of access to education.
- Hunger.
- Differences in opportunities access.
<h3>What percentage owns half of the wealth in the world?</h3>
Based on scientific studies, only 1% of the adult population owns at least half of the wealth. This clearly show how inequal the distribution of wealth is in the world.
Learn more about inequality in: brainly.com/question/11106414
#SPJ1
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Congressman has to respond to the Big Pizza Lobby taking these considerations in mind.
Congressman has to realize the impact of the presence of this big "company" in the market. Not only for other industries that cannot compete with this huge company but the impact it has on consumers.
The congressman would propose the kind of bill that benefits free trade, competence, and benefits consumers in a free market.
The big company is not going to stay "arms-folded." The company is going to hire lobbyists to negotiate with congressmen in order to promote its particular agendas and personal interests.
Of course, the big company wants to change the rules against it, and modify them to facilitate their interests. The negotiations can make legislators doubt or rethink a regulation. That is when Congressman has to think to support the interests of citizens, who were the ones who took him/her to office in the elections. So congressmen serve the people, not large companies.
