I believe the answer is: <span>A person will not be labeled as deviant unless his/her deviant behavior is in some way known to other people.
On top of that, the standard that considered as 'deviant' behavior must be the opposite of what considered as normal by the majority members of society.
This principle could explain why some people choose to hide their true nature/identities in order to avoid negative treatments.</span>
The answer is scientific method.
The scientific method was a new way to solve problems and conduct research in the 17th century. It is a process for experimentation that is used to explore observations and answer questions.
<span>diedre is encountering anxiety </span><span>a challenge in intercultural relationships.
In intercultural relationship, anxiety will become a gate that prevent people with different intercultural backgrounds to get close with one another (because people from different culture may appear to be weird or frightening for most people)
</span>
Answer:
The correct answer is: Letter of recommendation.
Explanation:
The letter of recommendation effect can be understood as the tendency that individuals have to provide biased positive assessments of someone being evaluated mainly because they know and like the person.
So they perceive them as being more responsible, conscientious and less neurotic which in turns results in providing unrealistically positive assessments.
When people like another person they tend to unconsiously exaggerate their positive traits and minimize the negative ones. In informant ratings this is called the Letter of recommendation effect.
<span>ART BY THOMAS POROSTOCKY</span>PRO: RESEARCH ON GENE EDITING IN HUMANS MUST CONTINUE
By John Harris
<span>John Harris is professor emeritus in science ethics at University of Manchester, U.K., and the author of How to be Good, Oxford University Press 2016.</span>
In February of this year, the Human Fertilization and Embryology Authority in the United Kingdom approved a request by the Francis Crick Institute in London to modify human embryos using the new gene editing technique CRISPR-Cas9. This is the second time human embryos have been employed in such research, and the first time their use has been sanctioned by a national regulatory authority. The scientists at the Institute hope to cast light on early embryo development—work which may eventually lead to safer and more successful fertility treatments.
The embryos, provided by patients undergoing in vitro fertilization, will not be allowed to develop beyond seven days. But in theory—and eventually in practice—CRISPR could be used to modify disease-causing genes in embryos brought to term, removing the faulty script from the genetic code of that person’s future descendants as well. Proponents of such “human germline editing” argue that it could potentially decrease, or even eliminate, the incidence of many serious genetic diseases, reducing human suffering worldwide. Opponents say that modifying human embryos is dangerous and unnatural, and does not take into account the consent of future generations.
