The point of checks and balances was to make sure no one branch would be able to control too much power, and it created a separation of powers. Here are some examples of how the different branches work together:
The legislative branch makes laws, but the President in the executive branch can veto those laws with a Presidential Veto.
The legislative branch makes laws, but the judicial branch can declare those laws unconstitutional.
The answer is; neutral.
<em>Hope this helped! :)</em>
Women's right varied from their social status. Royal women were able to participate in politics and economics. Where as women of low status were housewives, they just had children and cleaned. but in the early periods women respected more than men!
As a judge, i would rule in favor if Bakilana
By confiscating her password and forcing her to work for long hours, Bakilana had cause intentional infliction of emotional distress toward kiwanuka.
Bakilana has intentionally inflicted emotional distress to Kiwanuka by taking extreme/outrageous conduct such as taking her passwords and mentally abuse Kiwanuka.
But, that's being said, Kiwanuka does not present any proof about her accusation. (recording or witnesses). If Kiwanuka provide them, as a judge I will rule in favour of her. But since there is still a reasonable doubt that the accusation is false, i would rule in favor of Bakilana.
I THINK A CONCENTRATING MORE ON TRADITIONAL VALUES BECAUSE OF WHAT I HAVE HEARD AND WHAT MY TEACHER HAVE SAID ABOUT THEM WHEN SHE WENT THERE
