Answer:
Self-Fulfilling Prophecy
Explanation:
According to the description of the situation in the question we can say that this is an example of a Self-Fulfilling Prophecy. This is because a Self-Fulfilling Prophecy is when a person believes something will happen and subconsciously changes their behavior and causes it to happen. Which is what Kellie has done.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
Answer:
c. debit to Bad Debts Expense for $6,900.
Explanation:
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts $1,100 credit balance,
Estimated Un collectibles $8000 credit
Required Adjustment $ 6900 credit
The adjustment to record bad debts for the period will require a
c. debit to Bad Debts Expense for $6,900.
Bad Debt Expense $ 6900 Dr
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts $ 6900 Cr
Alternatively if the allowance account had a debit balance the entry would have been posted adding the two amounts.
Netflix is using the digital marketing technique of using measurable, data-driven information to add customer value.
This digital marketing technique of creating a list of potential films based on Lander's film screening history helps Netflix generate value for the customer, generating benefits such as:
- reduction in the time the client looks for a film.
- greater customer loyalty.
- creation of relationship and interaction between company and customer.
Therefore, artificial intelligence uses data to create value for the consumer, making the experience more targeted and aligned with consumer tastes and preferences, which makes the company better positioned and competitive in the market.
Learn more here:
brainly.com/question/8367090
Answer:
Yes, Dealer could collect damages from GM because basically GM breached the contract. Any time a contract is breached, the non-breaching party can sue. But the real question here is what amount could the court assign to Dealer as compensation for damages incurred. If you want to rephrase this question, it would be: What damages did Dealer suffer due to GM's breach.
If the damages are not significant, then the court will probably assign some amount for nominal damages. To be honest, the greatest expenses here are actually the legal costs of the lawsuit. Unless Dealer can prove that assigning the contract actually hurt them (which I doubt), then the court will assign a small amount. Sometimes nominal damages can be very small and mostly symbolic, e.g. $1.
Answer:
The variable costing unit product cost was <u>$69.</u>
Explanation:
Variable Product Costing is a situation whereby only the variable costs of production is taking into account to estimating the cost per unit of a product. This implies that none of the fixed cost will be included in the cost of the product.
Based on the explanation above, the variable costing unit product cost to produce a single product by Kray Inc. can be calculated as follows:
Kray Inc.
Calculation of Variable Costing Unit Product Cost
<u>Particulars Amount ($) </u>
Direct materials 40
Direct labor 19
Variable manufacturing overhead 8
Variable selling and administrative expense <u> 2 </u>
Variable cost per unit <u> 69 </u>
Therefore, the variable costing unit product cost was <u>$69.</u>
