Answer:
See below.
Explanation:
One is determined by the other. Civic action, from the 50's through the 60's, which was often meant with acts of extreme violence, led to the Civil Rights Act of 1964. So they are linked and one is dependent on the other.
Given that it is very difficult to isolate any one as being more or less effective than another. Civil rights action was targeted to be as effective as possible economically and politically. Leaders such as Martin Luther King emphasized the need for peaceful means of protest. So pressure group activity such as marches, demonstrations and lobbying politicians was combined with economic boycotts which hit the white economy in the south.
The greater the media coverage and outrage at the continued abuse of civil rights then the greater the pressure on the federal government to pass appropriate legislation. So how successful ahs this legislation been?
The Civil Rights Act in 1964 was followed by the Voting Rights Act in 1965, outlawing discriminatory practices in voting which was still commonplace in the south.
Passing legislation is one thing but making it effective is another. Minority groups have had to continue to fight in the courts to overcome discrimination and harassment. In 2000 the Presidential election came down to a few voting wards in Florida. Those primarily African-American suffered disenfranchisement, Chad machines that didn't work and road blocks. This, in effect, put Bush Jnr in the White House.
The Balkan Wars is I believe the answer
South American countries fell into dictatorships becuase they had the same conditions which supported dictators in Europe. Economic instability led to loss of faith in democractic institution. The military was more efficient than a legislature. However, one thing unique to Latin American states was the type of involvement by foreign governments, especially the United States, in their internal affairs. The US involvement in Latin American countries' internal affairs stemmed from the fear of increasing influence of Soviet Union during the Cold War.
The United States had a unique experience in that it had ample time and space to tackle the challenges it faced including a bloody civil war, expanding across the continent and giving equality to Blacks. There was no direct intervention by foriegn powers in American affairs. Moreover the founding father of United States had set up the tradition of a strong legislature. George Washington, the first American president, voluntarily gave up his military commission back to Congress after the Revolutionary War was over. He also left the Presidential office after two terms thereby creating a strong tradition.
For:
FDR lead us to Recovery. The overall economy increased. The Federal Government spent money to "jump start" the economy. He created more jobs which lead the unemployment rate to jump from 24 to 17%.
FDR was willing to adapt to the needs of Americans.
FDR lifted the spirits of millions of Americans by putting them back to work which made them feel more secure.
Against:
With all of the programs built, not one actually help solve the Great Depression. The second world war instead ended the Great Depression.
Critics saw that FDR was using his power in his own favor and was trying to overrun the constitution . AAA, Court Packing Plan, and the NRA.
Critics believed that there was too much government intervention.
Answer:
well you have to think back to ehat ever assinment that was and write a letter making decisions on how that carector behaves and how they feel ots really just going off of something youve already done
