1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
yKpoI14uk [10]
3 years ago
14

Southern colonies were mostly composed of poor Protestants and Catholics running from religious and political persecution in Eur

ope. *True *False
History
2 answers:
Pachacha [2.7K]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

false

Explanation:

slamgirl [31]3 years ago
5 0
False. They wanted to be independent from England
You might be interested in
Rights stated in English Common Law and the 1776 United States Declaration of Independence. Commonly described as fundamental ri
Elena-2011 [213]

Answer:  Unalienable rights

An added note of explanation:

You'll see both "unalienable" and "inalienable" used in description of these sorts of rights that cannot be taken away because they are not granted by man but are ever human being's natural possession.  In the final version of the <em>Declaration of Independence, </em>the spelling <em>unalienable </em>was used.  That was the copy of the document as transcribed by John Adams, which was used for printed copies to be made.  Thomas Jefferson's original draft used the spelling <em>inalienable</em>.  The two variations of the word were both in use at the time in the 18th century.  Either way, the word means something that cannot be made alien to you -- in other words, something that is naturally your possession and cannot be taken away from you.

5 0
3 years ago
According to Communist Manifesto (1848): how are the predictions of Marx accurate and inaccurate?
gavmur [86]

The Communist Manifesto, first published in 1848 for the Communist League, had little influence in its own day. Only after Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels' other writings had made their views on socialism widely known did it become a standard text. For about a century it was one of the most widely read (and some would argue misread) documents in the world.

But why study it today? Most of the communist world has collapsed. Nominally communist countries like Vietnam and China are busily building market economies in defiance of everything Marx advocated, and Korea and Cuba are barely surviving, serving as models for no one. Has not Marxism been relegated to the ash-heap of history?

There are several reasons why The Communist Manifesto is still an important document. As a historically significant work, it has a certain intrinsic interest. It is good to know what the great ideas are which have shaped history. Some people would argue that Marxists so thoroughly betrayed Marxism that the document can be used to show why attempts at building communist states failed: they were never truly Marxist at all. If true Marxism has never been tried, then it might be worth reconsidering afresh. Or if, as others argue, Marxism has intrinsic flaws that doomed it from the beginning, we might hope to discover traces of them here which might teach us why Marxism should be shunned. The goal here is not to convert you, but to help you explore Marx's writing from his point of view, so that you can understand his actual meaning while still maintaining a stance that can allow you to think critically about the subject and form your own opinions.

It is important to understand that Marx played two important roles in world history: as a critic of capitalism and as an advocate of socialism. He actually wrote very little on the latter subject. Although a strong believer in the importance of building socialism, he spent most of his time and energy on a subtle and complex critique of the capitalist system. This critique is still very influential on many historians, art and literature scholars, sociologists and others. There have been many neo-Marxisms which have been based more or less loosely on the original ideas of Marx and which are widely discussed today. Whether you want to explore such ideas or combat them, it's good to have some notion of the subject.

A manifesto is a document which proclaims publicly--or makes manifest-- the central ideas of a group or individual. Although the organization for which this one was written was underground (for the simple reason that it was illegal) Marx always envisioned the socialist movement as open. He rejected secret conspiracies because his ideal of building socialism was envisioned as a majority enterprise which could only accumulate the necessary momentum through an open, broadly-based campaign of education and exhortation.

Engels was Marx's close collaborator and an important thinker and writer in his own right. He outlived Marx by many years, and produced several volumes which are still influential. Marx was clearly the more powerful thinker of the two, but Engels was the better stylist. Although Engels may have been responsible for much of the eloquent writing in the Manifesto, because it incorporates Marx's ideas and embodies some central concepts of what came to be known as Marxism the following questions will refer to the authors simply as "Marx."






3 0
4 years ago
What is the purpose of the question and answer format of an article?
ArbitrLikvidat [17]

Answer:

to understand that is it we have understood the article

5 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is a person called when they move place to place
BartSMP [9]
<span>A nomad is someone who moves from place to place</span>
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What are consequences of globalization?
Oksi-84 [34.3K]

Globalization must be expected to influence the distribution of income as well as its level. So far as the distribution of income between countries is concerned, standard theory would lead one to expect that all countries will benefit. Economists have long preached that trade is mutually beneficial, and most of us believe that the experience of widespread growth alongside rapidly growing trade in the postwar period serves to substantiate that. Similarly most FDI goes where a multinational has intellectual capital that can contribute something to the local economy, and is therefore likely to be mutually beneficial to investor and recipient. And a flow of capital that finances a real investment is again likely to benefit both parties, since the yield on the investment is expected to be higher than the rate of interest the borrower has to pay, while that rate of interest is also likely to be higher than the lender could expect at home since otherwise there would have been no incentive to send it abroad. Loose talk about free trade making the rich countries richer and poor countries poorer finds no support in economic analysis.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What reasons may a voter in 1964 have had for not voting for a conservative?
    11·1 answer
  • How did the rome location affect its development
    9·1 answer
  • Trade was possible because the Sumerians had developed a complex division of labor. A. True B. False
    14·2 answers
  • What was the first thing human ever said?
    9·1 answer
  • South vietnam's army, the army of the republic of vietnam or ______ were trained to use american weapons.
    13·1 answer
  • Which of these cultures was not located in west africa? ghana songhai mali swahili?
    14·1 answer
  • Explain the statement :"Tremble , therefore , tyrants of the World" ??someone pls answer fast ...
    6·2 answers
  • From your reading, why do you think President president roosevelt believed america needed to expand its realm of influence?
    11·1 answer
  • Which of the following best defines conservation
    12·2 answers
  • 1. Does art have to be beautiful? Why or why not?
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!