All categories

3 years ago

--United States Government--

Social Studies

2 answers:

BigorU [14]3 years ago

3 0

Declaring war and coining money are considered expressed powers.

Expressed Powers, also called "Delegated Powers", are those that are listed in the U.S.'s Constitution, specifically in Article I, Section 8. There's a total of 27.

The Congress, which is a legislative branch that has a huge amount of authority over American national policy, is the one with the power of both: to declare war and to coin money.

Amiraneli [1.4K]3 years ago

3 0

Declaring war and coining money are considered as expressed powers.

Further Explanation:

Expressed powers are called delegated powers or in other words as enumerated powers. Expressed powers are defined in Article 1, section 8. The power includes coining money, regulating commerce, declaring war, lifting and maintaining armed forces, establishing a post office. The Constitution enumerated 27 powers to the federal government.

The expressed powers of the US federal constitution are a collection of taxes, duties and exercises, providing common defense, the welfare of the USA, regulating commerce with other nations, fixing the standards of weights, to make a standard rule of naturalization. It also establishes rules for naval forces, organizing Army, regulation of the territory and its properties. The other two powers are implied powers and inherent powers. The implied powers are those powers that are not mentioned in the Constitution. These powers are not explicitly mentioned in the Constitution. The decision to decide is left to the courts. Inherent powers grew out with the contemporary issues of the government.

Learn more:

1. The most influential and powerful members of a political party are most likely found

brainly.com/question/11032918

2. The president signing a trade agreement with China is an example of

brainly.com/question/4011746

Answer details:

Grade: High School

Subject: Political Science

Topic: Power

Keywords: Delegated powers, enumerated powers, article 1, section 8, coining money, regulating commerce, 27 powers, implied powers, inherent powers.

You might be interested in

What were the middle colonies government

Illusion [34]

Answer:

New york, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Delaware

Explanation:

7 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Annika recently joined the university intramural soccer team. She enjoys playing soccer but has never played competitively. Sabr

spin [16.1K]

Answer:

The answer is "Feel badly about herself but be motivated to play well".

Explanation:

The social contrast happens when they compete with those who they think are more important than all of us these upward correlations are often pointed at improving the present position or level of capacity. This can compare ourselves better with someone and find means of attaining similar outcomes referring to others, who are worse off than themselves, in downward prosocial behavior. These downwards correlations also focus on making our skills or traits feel good. For the analysis, it has been determined the upward comparisons appear and to make us feel better, whereas the upward social influence appears to drive us even more or greater.

7 0

2 years ago

What was required of people who wanted to settle in Texas before the Mexican Revolution?

DiKsa [7]

They had to declare they would become loyal Spanish subjects.

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

How might the government address negative externalities?

astraxan [27]

Answer:

Government can play a role in reducing negative externalities by taxing goods when their production generates spillover costs. This taxation effectively increases the cost of producing such goods. ... The use of such a tax is called internalizing the externality.

8 0

2 years ago

Law is not a respecter of persons discuss with 4 points

Mamont248 [21]

Answer:

My dear reader, the rule of law is not a respecter of person or group of persons. Every soul and institutions is equal before the law. Hence, no one is above the law. In any criminal trial, the onus of proving the guilt against an accused person arraigned before a court of law beyond reasonable doubt rest squarely on the prosecution unless, in some special cases when the prosecution closes its case having called witnesses to testify against an accused person.

3 0

2 years ago