<u>Answer:
</u>
While introducing and explaining the relationships between anatomy and physiology, most time would be spent talking about the organ systems.
Explanation:
- Anatomy and physiology are two disciplines that serve as the soul of medical sciences.
- The common ground for both disciplines is the study of organ systems within the human body as anatomy is the science that dispenses information about the organs and their functions separately and physiology is the discipline in which the functional correlation between the organs is studied.
I believe the answer is: Public speaking
There are three major purpose for someone to conduct a public speaking. The first one is to inform the audience, the second purpose is to persuade the audiences to do something, and the third purpose public speaking is to entertain the audiences.
Jason studies Spanish for three years, and then switches to Pashto. When asked to remember Spanish vocabulary he can’t, instead he can only remember Pashto vocabulary. This is an example of <u>retroactive </u>interference.
Answer: Option D
<u>Explanation:</u>
Retro active interference means that the individual can not remember the older information that he had learnt because the recent information is acting as an obstacle in recalling the older information.
The new information is a problem which does not let the old information to be recalled. That is why Jason can not recall Spanish which he had learnt three years ago and only remembers Pashto which he had learnt recently. Pashto is acting as an obstacle in recalling the Spanish language.
Answer and Explanation:
1. Prosecutors may claim that the inaccurate report to which Rachel had access could induce misinterpretation on her part and that, in any case, Peter was already on the police for vandalism, which contributed to Rachel's conclusion. These justifications would not be successful, because Rachel had many ways to find out what actually happened to Peter.
2. Peter would sue Rachel for defamation and would likely succeed, as he has several witnesses that Rachel released incorrect information and that it affects his reputation.
3. The current malice is necessary in this case because Peter is a very well-known and popular person, and it is important that the current malice is inserted in the case, to speed up the process.
4. The fair report privilege can be used to protect Rachel, since the false information about Peter that she exposed, had as its only source a public document that induced her to publish the defamation.
