Answer:
Risk Breakdown Structure
Explanation:
According to my research on the different techniques or structures used within organizations, I can say that based on the information provided within the question the term being used is called Risk Breakdown Structure. This structure is a pyramid structure which organizes different project risks and arranges them by category.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
Answer:
a. The cost of the marble will be expensive because of the bargaining power of the supplier.
Explanation:
I Think its answer C: Fixed and Variable rates
Answer:
A) decrease MPC, increase MPS, and decrease the multiplier so that changes in planned investment will have a smaller impact on equilibrium output.
Explanation:
When you receive money, e.g. get paid by your employer, the first thing you do is pay for your basic necessities which are classified as autonomous spending. Then hopefully you will have some money left which is classified as disposable income. You can do two things with your disposable income, either spend it or save it.
The proportion that you spend is called the marginal propensity to consume (MPC) and the remaining part that you save is called the marginal propensity to save (MPS). If the MPS was 1% in 2007 and increased to 5% in 2009, then the MPC was 0.99 in 2007 and 0.95 in 2009.
The formula to calculate the economic multiplier is 1 / MPS:
- the economic multiplier in 2007 = 1 / 1% = 100
- the economic multiplier in 2009 = 1 / 5% = 20
Answer:
The full description of the particular circumstance is listed underneath in the overview section.
Explanation:
- Throughout the one side, as either a consequence of getting fathomed their deal, I have seen whether it could be Luther's mistake and therefore tried repeatedly to be doing the promotions that may be thought of as unfair intervention, but it does not mean that he did so to mess with their deal when he could have simply considered mischievously promoting.
- As either a consequence of the positioning of these commercials, he undoubtedly planned to intervene legitimately with the mere truth of comprehension of the deal. Because Martha as well as Harley seems to have a deal, as a direct consequence of maintaining a long-term partnership within the deal, Martha may be the controller responsible for the unjust personal behavior, and Martha just skits the service agreement as something of a consequence of loving the advertisements.
- I wouldn’t believe they would always keep Martha accountable for anything although she might using the justification that religion gave her a more comprehensive bargain that is fair to justify unjust action. There seem to be no separate offenses whereby Harley can use for her protection, such as aggravated assault or slander.
