Answer:
Jamal
Explanation:
Given that
Number of required slides = 50 slides
Creating slides Per hour = 15 slides
Bill amount per hour = $750
So by considering the above information, Bette's opportunity cost of creating slides would be
= Bill amount per hour ÷ creating slides per hour
= $750 ÷ 15 per hour
= $50
For making 50 slides, the opportunity cost would be
= $50 × 50 slides
= $2,500
And, Jamal opportunity cost is 30% lower, so it would be
= $50 - $50 × 30%
= $50 - $15
= $35
And, the billing rate is 25% higher, so it would be
= $750 + $750 × 25%
= $750 + $187.50
= $937.50
So in one hour, it would be
= $937.50 ÷ 35 slides
= 26 slides
Based on the creating slides, the Jamal gains a competitive advantage over Bette
Answer:
The amount of goodwill that is recorded by Large is $5 million
Explanation:
Goodwill is the excess of price consideration paid to acquire controlling stake in a company over the fair value of the company's net assets.
Net assets in the sense implies the fair value of total assets less fair value of liabilities.
Fair value of total assets is $9 million
Fair value of liabilities is $3 million
As a result net assets upon acquisition is $6 million($9 million less $3 million)
Since the consideration paid in acquiring Small's voting stake is $11 million, goodwill is $5 million($11 million less $6 million).
The $ 5 million is the excess of purchase consideration over the fair value of Small's net assets as at the date of acquisition
Answer:
a. mostly cigarette buyers.
Explanation:
The law of demand states an inverse relationship between quantity demanded of a good and it's price, keeping other factors affecting demand as constant.
Price elasticity of demand refers to the degree of responsiveness of quantity demanded to a change in price.
Alcohol and cigarettes are exceptions to the law of demand since in their case, the factor of addiction presides which outweighs rational decision making.
Thus, price elasticity of demand of cigarettes is inelastic. So a marginally higher price charged for cigarettes will not reduce their consumption.
A new tax on cigarettes would raise their prices. The manufacturers, to cover such taxes and maintain the same margin as before would further raise the prices of cigarettes further.
Thus, the tax burden would be shifted to the consumers and hence majorly borne by them.
Direct labour rate variance = (3875) unfavourable, Direct labour efficiency rate = (800) unfavourable
<u>Explanation:</u>
<u>Computation of Direct Material Price & Quantity Variance
</u>
Direct Material Purchase - Price variance = (SP minus AP) multiply AQ Purchase ($1.45 minus $1.48) multiply19000 = ($570) Unfavourable
Direc Material Quantity Variance =(SQ-AQ)SP =
((20 multiply600)-10500) multiply$1.45 = $2,175 Favourable
Direct Material Price variance - (SP minus AP)AQ Used = ($1.45minus $1.48) multiply10500 = ($315) Unfavourable
<u>Computation of Direct Labour Rate & Efficiency Variance
</u>
Direct Labour Rate variance = (SR minus AR)multiply AH
= ($8 minus $9.25) multiply3100 = -3875 Un Favourable
Direct Labour Efficiency Variance (SH minus AH)multiply SR
= ((5 multiply 600) minus 3100)multiply8) = -800 Un Favourable
