Answer:
It should accept the special order at the price of $36 as the total marginal cost will be $28.5 (27 variable cost + 1.15 shipping cost).
Explanation:
Special orders are accepted only if marginal revenue increases the marginal cost. Marginal cost is the total cost incurred to fulfill any order.
In the given scenario, since the Company already has adequate capacity and it will not incur any additional fixed cost, therefore the order can be accepted by taking variable cost in to consideration.
Marginal Revenue 36
Less: Marginal Cost
Variable Cost (27)
Shipping Cost <u> (1.15)</u>
Total Profit from Order <u> 7.85</u>
Answer: a). Spain
b). none
c). 2.4
Explanation: a). Absolute advantage occurs when a country produces more of a good than the other country. In this case, Spain produces 50 units of Tractors while, Bolivia produces only 30 units of Tractors. Thus, Since Spain is producing more it has an absolute advantage in Tractors.
b). Both the countries are producing equal units of Cotton. Thus, we can say that none of them has an absolute advantage in cotton production.
c. Opportunity cost is the cost of the lost alternative. When Spain produces Tractors it is sacrificing production of Cotton. So, opportunity cost on 1 unit of Tractor will be,

Thus, 2.4 units of cotton which is given up is the opportunity cost of Spain for producing 1 unit of Tractor.
Answer:
Fee based fund is the correct answer to the given question
Explanation:
In the fee based funds exercise the money is charged directly to customers.The Fee-Based Funds is imposing the charge of sales to the customer .The Fee-based funds consultants could charge an extra payment of fixed price according to the company policy .
- When the company sells the mutual fund in a fee-based consideration individuals will buy the bond fund Series of the F units.
- All the other options are not related to imposing the sales charge that's why they are incorrect option .
Answer:
More accessible goods
An increase in international trade
A rise in regional Jobs
Answer:
Option C She can claim an estimated value for the auto if the charity uses it rather than selling it
Explanation:
The reason is that the tax encourages you to make donations because the non for profit organization is doing the same thing which government does, they serve the people. So if the NGO is not selling the old car then the tax says that use the fair value of the asset as a amount donated to the charitable foundation. So the right answer here which includes the use of fair value is only Option C.