1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Katena32 [7]
3 years ago
14

5. Wanting to be a good teammate, Erika never mentioned the other players. She expected them to step up and admit their involvem

ent. She ended up taking the fall alone. Her teammates avoided her, saying they were happy the cheater was off of the team. With the exam postponed, they were treated as heroes for winning the championship without her. Erika transferred to another school, remembered as the girl who cheated to make straight A's. Today, a star athlete and college scholar, Erika blames past mistakes on no one but herself. The ball is in her hands again. This time she plans on making better decisions.
Which of the following facts is expressed implicitly in paragraph 5?
Erika transferred to another school.
Erika's teacher postponed the exam.
Erika's team won the championship.
Erika was hurt by her teammates.
English
2 answers:
blsea [12.9K]3 years ago
8 0

Answer: Erika was hurt by her teammates plz make me brainliest

inessss [21]3 years ago
6 0
Erika was hurt by her teammates
You might be interested in
What is the theme that lincoln states from the declaration of independence in the first paragraph
Margaret [11]

Answer:

Where is the paragraph?

Explanation:

Sorry but i cant help without the paragraph!

5 0
3 years ago
Past perfect form<br>PLEASE LOOK AND HELP ME!!​
DanielleElmas [232]

Answer:

1. Had not been prepared

2.  Had spent

3. Had not booked

4. had

5. had not ride

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Paraphrase Madison’s premise in these lines. Why is this a premise and not a claim? The Federalist No
nikdorinn [45]

Answer:

Summary

Madison begins perhaps the most famous of the Federalist papers by stating that one of the strongest arguments in favor of the Constitution is the fact that it establishes a government capable of controlling the violence and damage caused by factions. Madison defines factions as groups of people who gather together to protect and promote their special economic interests and political opinions. Although these factions are at odds with each other, they frequently work against the public interest, and infringe upon the rights of others.

Both supporters and opponents of the plan are concerned with the political instability produced by rival factions. The state governments have not succeeded in solving this problem; in fact, the situation is so problematic that people are disillusioned with all politicians and blame government for their problems. Consequently, a form of popular government that can deal successfully with this problem has a great deal to recommend it.

Given the nature of man, factions are inevitable. As long as men hold different opinions, have different amounts of wealth, and own different amount of property, they will continue to fraternize with people who are most similar to them. Both serious and trivial reasons account for the formation of factions but the most important source of faction is the unequal distribution of property. Men of greater ability and talent tend to possess more property than those of lesser ability, and since the first object of government is to protect and encourage ability, it follows that the rights of property owners must be protected. Property is divided unequally, and, in addition, there are many different kinds of property. and men have different interests depending upon the kind of property they own. For example, the interests of landowners differ from those who own businesses. Government must not only protect the conflicting interests of property owners but must, at the same time, successfully regulate the conflicts between those with and without property.

To Madison, there are only two ways to control a faction: to remove its causes and to control its effects. The first is impossible. There are only two ways to remove the causes of a faction: destroy liberty or give every citizen the same opinions, passions, and interests. Destroying liberty is a "cure worse then the disease itself," and the second is impracticable. The causes of factions are thus part of the nature of man and we must deal with their effects and accept their existence. The government created by the Constitution controls the damage caused by such factions.

The framers established a representative form of government, a government in which the many elect the few who govern. Pure or direct democracies (countries in which all the citizens participate directly in making the laws) cannot possibly control factious conflicts. This is because the strongest and largest faction dominates, and there is no way to protect weak factions against the actions of an obnoxious individual or a strong majority. Direct democracies cannot effectively protect personal and property rights and have always been characterized by conflict.

If the new plan of government is adopted, Madison hopes that the men elected to office will be wise and good men,­ the best of America. Theoretically, those who govern should be the least likely to sacrifice the public good to temporary condition, but the opposite might happen. Men who are members of particular factions, or who have prejudices or evil motives might manage, by intrigue or corruption, to win elections and then betray the interests of the people. However, the possibility of this happening in a large country, such as the United States, is greatly reduced. The likelihood that public office will be held by qualified men is greater in large countries because there will be more representatives chosen by a greater number of citizens. This makes it more difficult for the candidates to deceive the people. Representative government is needed in large countries, not to protect the people from the tyranny of the few, but to guard against the rule of the mob.

3 0
3 years ago
Which figurative language comes across most clearly in this excerpt from T.S. Eliot's "Preludes"?
astraxan [27]
The figurative language that comes across most clearly in the excerpt from T.S eliot's preludes is : Imagery
The excerpt filled with visual symbolism that became a basic characteristic og an imagery

hope this helps
4 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What song would describe your life right now?
Nataly_w [17]

Answer:

/watch?v=dQw4w9WgXcQ

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Hellllppppp
    12·1 answer
  • The famous book on economics, The Wealth of Nations, was written by _____.
    9·1 answer
  • What type of rhyme appears in these lines from Emily Dickinson's poem "Angels in the Early Morning"?
    11·2 answers
  • edwards says his listeners are hanging by a thread over the fires of eternal punishment. what will happen when this thread comes
    12·1 answer
  • Word choices, sentence patterns, and other stylistic elements convey how an author feels about the topic about which he or she i
    8·1 answer
  • Don wants to get an early start on his social studies semester project. The teacher has assigned the students to choose and rese
    11·2 answers
  • Read this excerpt from a poem.
    8·2 answers
  • Outline about teeth​
    5·2 answers
  • Which of the following would be the best subtitle for the excerpt? A. "The Disease Carrier" B. "Toward a Cleaner City" C. "Life
    11·1 answer
  • Read this student reaction to a text.
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!