1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
vaieri [72.5K]
4 years ago
6

Write 2 versions of a paragraph describing an experience you have had. Choose words, phrases, and sentences structures that crea

te a formal tone in the first version and an informal tone in the second. Identify which version best fits the event your writing describes
English
1 answer:
aivan3 [116]4 years ago
7 0

Answer:

Explanation:

Formal writing is that form of writing which is used for the business, legal, academic or professional purpose. On the other hand, informal writing is one which is used for personal or casual purpose. Formal writing must use a professional tone, whereas a personal and emotional tone can be found in informal writing.

You might be interested in
harry works at a men ' s clothing store , which marks up its retail cloting by 27% if the store purchases suit jackests for $ 32
sladkih [1.3K]

Answer:$412.75

Explanation:

If they up sell by 27% you would need to take the original price of $325 and find 27% of that. To do this, multiply 325x.27 (.27 is 27% converted to a decimal) which is = to 87.75 you then need to add $87.75 to $325 which will get you $412.75.

6 0
3 years ago
Which sentences have the infinitives correctly underlined? Check all that apply.
zalisa [80]

Answer:

I think its D

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Spanish explorers brought tomato seeds to Europe in the early 1500s. At that time, most Europeans thought tomatoes were toxic an
PtichkaEL [24]

Answer:

answer is b

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Paraphrase Madison’s premise in these lines. Why is this a premise and not a claim? The Federalist No
nikdorinn [45]

Answer:

Summary

Madison begins perhaps the most famous of the Federalist papers by stating that one of the strongest arguments in favor of the Constitution is the fact that it establishes a government capable of controlling the violence and damage caused by factions. Madison defines factions as groups of people who gather together to protect and promote their special economic interests and political opinions. Although these factions are at odds with each other, they frequently work against the public interest, and infringe upon the rights of others.

Both supporters and opponents of the plan are concerned with the political instability produced by rival factions. The state governments have not succeeded in solving this problem; in fact, the situation is so problematic that people are disillusioned with all politicians and blame government for their problems. Consequently, a form of popular government that can deal successfully with this problem has a great deal to recommend it.

Given the nature of man, factions are inevitable. As long as men hold different opinions, have different amounts of wealth, and own different amount of property, they will continue to fraternize with people who are most similar to them. Both serious and trivial reasons account for the formation of factions but the most important source of faction is the unequal distribution of property. Men of greater ability and talent tend to possess more property than those of lesser ability, and since the first object of government is to protect and encourage ability, it follows that the rights of property owners must be protected. Property is divided unequally, and, in addition, there are many different kinds of property. and men have different interests depending upon the kind of property they own. For example, the interests of landowners differ from those who own businesses. Government must not only protect the conflicting interests of property owners but must, at the same time, successfully regulate the conflicts between those with and without property.

To Madison, there are only two ways to control a faction: to remove its causes and to control its effects. The first is impossible. There are only two ways to remove the causes of a faction: destroy liberty or give every citizen the same opinions, passions, and interests. Destroying liberty is a "cure worse then the disease itself," and the second is impracticable. The causes of factions are thus part of the nature of man and we must deal with their effects and accept their existence. The government created by the Constitution controls the damage caused by such factions.

The framers established a representative form of government, a government in which the many elect the few who govern. Pure or direct democracies (countries in which all the citizens participate directly in making the laws) cannot possibly control factious conflicts. This is because the strongest and largest faction dominates, and there is no way to protect weak factions against the actions of an obnoxious individual or a strong majority. Direct democracies cannot effectively protect personal and property rights and have always been characterized by conflict.

If the new plan of government is adopted, Madison hopes that the men elected to office will be wise and good men,­ the best of America. Theoretically, those who govern should be the least likely to sacrifice the public good to temporary condition, but the opposite might happen. Men who are members of particular factions, or who have prejudices or evil motives might manage, by intrigue or corruption, to win elections and then betray the interests of the people. However, the possibility of this happening in a large country, such as the United States, is greatly reduced. The likelihood that public office will be held by qualified men is greater in large countries because there will be more representatives chosen by a greater number of citizens. This makes it more difficult for the candidates to deceive the people. Representative government is needed in large countries, not to protect the people from the tyranny of the few, but to guard against the rule of the mob.

3 0
3 years ago
The closing is the part of the conversation where you ___________________. a. share what the conversation is about. b. finish yo
snow_lady [41]
The answer is b, finish your conversation. I hope this helps!
6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • 3<br>.<br>What are the major contributions of type 2 diabetes?​
    9·1 answer
  • Read an excerpt from "Television and the Public Interest" and answer the question. The speech was delivered by Newton N. Minow,
    14·1 answer
  • Tell 3 ways that computers and technology have improved your life directly
    13·2 answers
  • Which analogy shows the relationship of person to function?
    7·2 answers
  • What is symbolism? events in the plot a technique writers use to reveal deeper thematic elements the character’s statements, bel
    12·2 answers
  • One of the first aphorisms we hear from Morrie is “Learn to forgive yourself and to forgive others.” Why is forgiveness importan
    9·1 answer
  • One purpose of President Reagan's Address at Moscow State University was to o inform listeners about well-known Russian writers.
    14·2 answers
  • If you could, which celebrity would you hug, if you met them? (your choice)
    7·2 answers
  • Write a letter inviting a friend to watch a sports match
    12·1 answer
  • Please help me with this homework choose the correct sentence
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!