Affective individualism is an alleged process that occurred in industrialized countries in the 1700s, though its existence remains controversial.
The theory argues that, up to that point, the extended family and the wider community represented very strong ties for people, which made the nuclear family a smaller role in emotional fulfillment. This meant that marriages and procreation were often instrumental.
However, with the rise of affective individualism, families started to change in several ways:
- The nuclear family became more important, and the centre of family life.
- Having children became less instrumental an more driven by affective reasons.
- Marriages were more and more commonly based on love, as opposed to convenience.
- Sex became more important as a source of pleasure, and not only as an instrument for reproduction.
It is also argued that these changes, which for the most part accompanied industrialization, helped the development of capitalism.
Answer:
<h2>$80</h2>
Explanation:
Step one:
What is consumer surplus area?
"Consumer Surplus reflects the difference between what a consumer is willing and able to pay for a product, and what the consumer actually ends up paying.
"
<em>The area of surplus is calculated using the formula for the area of the bounded triangle.</em>
<em>Area of surplus =1/2 b*h</em>
<em>where b= the quantity </em>
<em> h= consumer surplus</em>
Step two:
given data
<em>the quantity </em>of tickets = 4
b=Q-O------------ (from the chart attached)
cost per tieckt= $15
Total cost of 4 tickets= 15*4= $60
the actual price is $60
Since you are willing to pay $25 per ticket
the total amount you are willing to pay is = 25*4= $100
Consumer surplus = y-p------------ (from the chart attached)
Consumer surplus = $100 – $60
Consumer surplus = $40
<em>Area of surplus = </em>1/2 x (4) x40 = $80
It was to broad and gave the state's power allowing people to do what they wanted there was no strong centeral government in order to take lead
gave congress no power to tax so they had no money
provided no common currency
and gave states one vote regardless of size