Answer:
1. imperialism, slavery, mercantilism
2. Europe saw the colonies as a source of income and profit, usinf the univesal role of mercantilism, trade generates wealth and is stimulated by the accumulation of profitable balances, which a government should encourage by means of protectionism. and the natives of the land would get them those resorses for trade.
3. they often times gave benefits to natives that would convert to christianity.
4. the forces people to asimmalte to their culture by teaching them their sports, language, religion, ect. and refusal to do so could result in punishments however willingness to do so resulted in benefits
5. they will most likley come to hold distane upon them for the passed and making them assimalate to their culture and not allowing them to keep their native culture.
6. (i cant find the video but it should be stated if you look back through)
7. in hati they had more nations involded namley france and spain where as mexico only had to worry about spain. and in mexico they were led by a minister while in hati they were led by a former war hero and slave.
The correct answer is A) providing guides and limits to the government’s power.
The Constitution regulates government powers by providing guides and limits to the government’s power.
That is why the Constitution establishes a federal form of government with sovereign states. The federal government is divided into a system of checks and balances so no branch has more power than the other. The branches of the government are the executive branch that relies on the US President, the legislative branch that is the House of Representatives and the Senate, and the judicial branch that relies on the Supre Court.
Answer:
The answer is B. It was the best way to grow large cash crops.
Explanation:
I hope I answered in time.
Hope this helps!!!
Answer:
summer in the City Preeti oh yeah
Answer: Each country had its own agenda about the post-war world.
Context/explanation:
Churchill in particular, along with Roosevelt, pushed strongly for Stalin to allow free elections to take place in the nations of Europe after the war. At that time Stalin agreed, but there was a strong feeling by the other leaders that he might renege on that promise. The Soviets never did allow those free elections to occur. Later, Winston Churchill wrote, "Our hopeful assumptions were soon to be falsified." Stalin and the Soviets felt they needed the Eastern European nations as satellites to protect their own interests. So one key point of disagreement between Stalin and the other two was over the direction things would take in Eastern Europe after the war.
While Winston Churchill and Franklin Delano Roosevelt were on the same page in many ways, there were also key differences between them. As noted by The Churchill Project of Hillsdale College, "FDR, ever the optimist, believed (or wanted to believe) that Stalin could be convinced that the West was not committed to destruction of the Soviet regime." Churchill had a much more skeptical view of Stalin and the Soviet Union and approached the relationship in a firmer fashion. Roosevelt had hoped to continue cooperation with the USSR. That changed under Truman, who took over the US Presidency after FDR's death. Truman was strongly anti-communist in his stance.
Another difference between Roosevelt and Churchill pertained to colonialism and imperialism. Again as noted by The Churchill Project: "Over colonialism. Roosevelt firmly believed European colonialism had been a major cause of World War I, and that it had continued to be a source of international disputes and tensions before World War II. Churchill had sworn defend the realm, which, when he took office, included the British Empire." As it happened, after World War II, colonialism's days were numbered and independence movements broke out around the world where imperial powers had dominated.
