Answer:
The correct answer is that eyewitness can be very flaky and untrustworthy.
Explanation:
To the jury, yes their is a eyewitness of this allegedly robbery that my client is being accused of, however how can we be certain that what he says is true. I agree their is nothing that can tell us this person is lying but also there is nothing that is telling they are telling the truth. People sometimes think they saw something when that thing did not occured, it may not be their intentions but the consequences that my client could suffer if you belive in whatever the eyewitness says can be very detremental. As well, for all we know this eyewitness could be the thief and they are saying they saw someone else do it to take the fault out of their way.
So please jury, dont think just because someone says they think they saw somethin that saw the right thing and that they are not lying.
Vast acreage is devoted to soybeans; introduced successfully into South Carolina in the 1940s, the crop has become a mainstay of the agricultural economy. Tobacco, for many years the state's leading crop, also remains central to the sector, despite a precipitous drop in production since the late 1990s.
Before rapidly industrializing in the 1950s, South Carolina primarily had an agricultural economy throughout its history. During the antebellum period, the state's economy was based almost solely on the exportation of cotton and rice cultivated using the labor of enslaved Africans. By the time of the American Revolution, the exportation of rice to Europe made the lowcountry the wealthiest region in North America. But, South Carolina's economic importance in the union began to decline following the Panic of 1819 and the expansion of cotton cultivation in the Old Southwest.
They didn't the north did. The south used slaves which the north was against
1) monarch
2) country
3)trial
4)individual
5)government
3 and 5 could be switched
a 4th grade rat is a wimp in 4th grade
