The cell membranes begin to come apart when there is insufficient water around the cells. The cytoplasm of the cells becomes more concentrated, which slowly poisons the cells. The cell walls become brittle as they dry out, and some of them collapse. The central vacuoles in the cells lose water and can no longer help support the cells.
The central vacuoles in the cells lose water and can no longer help support the cells
Prokaryotic And Eukaryotic :)
This is called 'controlled' or 'prescribed' burning. Usually fires in the environment are regarded as undesirable and dangerous, but fires actually fulfil an important ecological role, and animals and plants had adapted to a certain frequency and intensity of fires. The seeds of some trees or grasses germinate after forest or grass fires, as the more open conditions after a fire allows the seedlings to compete and avoid being shaded and smothered by more established trees. Unfortunately, farming and forestry practices have in many cases resulted in a reduction of fires. A reduction in the frequency of fires also allows the build up of dead wood, and when a wild fire does occur, the amount of available fuel results in very hot, large and damaging fires. Therefore, management of forests and other environments such as prairies often use controlled burns to avoid the buildup of dead organic mass and to replicate the natural fire cycle.
Answer:
New technological inventions ( like wristband trackers, microchip, etcetera ) used by employers to monitor their employees has proven to be a cause for worrying.
These gadgets has the potency of causing a level of discomfort and health problems for the employees who use it (though most times is against their will).
I suggest regulatory bodies, government agencies and stakeholders should review its terms of use.
Also, these devices can fail and night give a result not corresponding or not accurate to the employees physical psychological state. This will end up misleading the employee, and it can lead to employer / employee dispute .
Answer:
The animal was most likely an omnivore.
Explanation:
From the dentition, the animal is most likely an omnivore. Carnivores have large and sharp canines for tearing of flesh while most herbivores lack canines altogether.
