1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
d1i1m1o1n [39]
3 years ago
10

~50 Points~

History
1 answer:
ANEK [815]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

Labor

Explanation:

A. Well labor needed to be changed, in the New World (colonial times) labor wasn't in favor for the colonists but, slaves and indentured servants were. Mostly slaves had it bad, indentured servants were there to work for you for a couple of years to pay of their debt and a free ride to the new world.  America only wanted a way to keep people as their workers to build, cook, and farm for them. So they came up with slaves. Slaves were African people who were forced to work for their owners till they die.

B. To make "changes" Britain kept coming up with acts to set up the colonists.

C. Although their making only started wars and fights. So they weren't that successful.

D. Today we pay people to do their work but the people who did the work would not be kept. They'd still have their rights as humans.

(Hopefully this helped!!! <3 )

You might be interested in
Who painted the monalisa​
sp2606 [1]
Leonardo da Vinci. It is his most famous and valuable painting ever.
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
8. Review the map of the Aryan migration below. Which of the following explains the
IgorC [24]

Answer:

crops grown along the ocean shore thrived more than crops along the river

8 0
3 years ago
All the following were effects of the Panic of 1983 except?
SashulF [63]

I AHVE NO CLUE WHAT THAT IS

3 0
3 years ago
Which of the following are ways that people in democracies can take part in politics and government?
stira [4]

Answer:

D all of these are ways to take part in politics

7 0
3 years ago
Did President Johnson’s actions in response to the Gulf of Tonkin incident show a “monolithic” (rigid) view of communism? Explai
e-lub [12.9K]

The reaction of President Johnson to the Gulf of Tonkin incident did indeed show a monolithic view of Communism because he believed that Communism was dangerous.

<h3>What was the Gulf of Tonkin incident?</h3>

This was an event in 1964 when it was said that North Vietnamese navy boats attacked American naval destroyers in the Gulf of Tonkin.

The North Vietnamese were Communists and Johnson responded by increasing U.S. involvement in the Vietnam War.

This shows a rigid view of Communism because Johnson thought that it would be right to go after Communists in Vietnam because all Communists were dangerous.

Find out more on the Gulf of Tonkin incident at brainly.com/question/15593184.

#SPJ1

7 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • What religious founding father is shared by Jews, Christians, and Muslims?
    9·2 answers
  • During the Vietnam War, most Americans became aware of the Tet Offensive as a result of
    13·2 answers
  • Many houses along the Gulf Coast are built on stilts. What purpose does this design most likely serve?
    11·2 answers
  • The amendment ending taxes or fees at the voting ballot was ratified in
    8·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP ME OUT!!
    15·1 answer
  • Latvia, belarus, and ukraine have what 2 exports in common
    9·1 answer
  • What strengths did the North and South have<br> at the start of the war?
    11·1 answer
  • Why did Egypt sell their “shares' ( partial ownership) of the Suez Canal to England?
    7·1 answer
  • The concept of yin and yang represented the balancing nature of
    14·1 answer
  • Explain why the Federalists believe the U.S. should make money primarily from<br> manufacturing
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!