Answer:
The Seljuks.
Explanation:
The Seljuk are a people of Turkic origin. Armies of the Seljuk Empire clashed with the forces of the Byzantine Empire at the Manzikert Plains on August 26, 1071 AD. The Byzantine army was crushed and slaughtered by the victorious Seljuks. Emperor Romanos IV Diogenes was taken captive. The Byzantine strength was seriously weakened and Turkmens took control of Anatolia, where they spread.
One negative about the slave trade was that it tended to increase the amount of war that occurred in West Africa. The reason for this is that European (and American) slave traders did not simply go out into the African countryside and kidnap their own slaves. Instead, they bought slaves from the coastal kingdoms. Those kingdoms generally got slaves to sell through war and through raids against inland tribes. Because the slave traders wanted more slaves, the coastal kingdoms were encouraged to wage more wars and conduct more raids against their neighbors. In addition, those kingdoms were provided with things like guns in exchange for slaves. This helped those kingdoms have a greater capacity for waging war.
This brings us to the one (short-term) benefit of the slave trade: it initially helped the coastal kingdoms. Those kingdoms became richer and more powerful because they were able to get guns, money, and other things in exchange for the slaves.
However, even these kingdoms were hurt in the long term. This is because the slave trade hurt all of West Africa. First, the slave trade took away millions of Africans (men more than women) in the prime of their lives. This badly disrupted both the cultures and the economies of the African nations. Because they were disrupted, they were less able to progress. The link below argues that the slave trade made it harder for Africa to enjoy an agrarian revolution and, in turn, an industrial revolution. This is because the men and women who could have helped make these revolutions were being taken into slavery. Because the African nations did not develop economically and because their societies were weakened, they were unable to effectively resist the Europeans when the Europeans started to colonize Africa.
Thus, we can say that Africa was badly harmed by the slave trade. The trade made war more common, harmed the economies and societies of the nations from which the slaves came, and eventually made it easier for Africa to be colonized by the Europeans.
LOLLOLLLOOLOLLOLLOLOLOLLO
Answer:
I am a child of the eighties, a child of parents of the sixties. They were both liberals and brought me up to be a liberal who believed everyone was equal. I was brought up on the music of Pete Seeger, Tom Paxton and a bunch of others it was part of the music of my childhood and it formed a good part of my political ideology.
And if I were to travel back to the 50s now, you can imagine how I would react to segregation utter abhorrence and disgust and protesting against it as much as possible.
An 1896 Supreme Court decision, Plessy v. Ferguson, had declared “separate but equal” Jim Crow segregation legal. The Plessy ruling asserted that so long as purportedly “equal” accommodations were supplied for African Americans, the races could, legally, be separated. In consequence, “colored” and “whites only” signs proliferated across the South at facilities such as water fountains, restrooms, bus waiting areas, movie theaters, swimming pools, and public schools.
Explanation:
During the 1850s the decline and demise of the whig party allowed the birth and development of the REPUBLICAN PARTY, which grew in power in the northern states. The whig party was politically active in 1850s, the party fell due to internal tension related to the expansion of slavery to the territories of the United States. The whig party was succeeded by the Republican Party.
