Answer:
b. $1.87
Explanation:
Number of order taking costs = $20,592
Number of orders = 187,200
Cost of activity
= $20,592 ÷ 187,200
= $0.11
The Statement of overhead allocated is given below:-
Number of orders = 17
Cost per activity = $0.11
Cost
= 17 × $0.11
= $1.87
Therefore, the overhead is applied to the Tucker family account for order taking costs $1.87
Answer:
$ 13.167 / unit
Explanation:
Data provided:
Beginning material cost = $ 126,000
Number of units in work in progress = 12,000 units
Material cost assigned = $ 32,000
thus,
the total material cost involved = $ 126,000 + $ 32,000 = $ 158,000
Now,
the material cost per equivalent unit = Total material cost involved / number of units
on substituting the values, we have
the material cost per equivalent unit = $ 158,000 / 12,000
or
= $ 13.167 / unit
First, we add up all the benefits that Gerome Houser gets from his job. That is,
$1,755 + $3,898 + $2,898 +$2,098 +$1,404 = $12,053
Then, we divide this amount by his annual salary and multiply the quotient by 100% to get the answer.
($12,053 / $45,623) x 100% = 26.4%
Therefore, Gerome Houser's rate of benefits is approximately 26.4%.
Answer:
General Motors had more of a Production Orientation
Explanation:
The company which is production oriented focuses on the production and company's production processes and runs campaigns to sell the product produced or the product they are producing. General motors produced the products which it is good in producing the products and won the market against great giants like Ford, Toyota and German auto companies. Whereas Toyota was developing market which is newly born and started pricing their products on the basis of products that were desired (environmentally friendly products) and lost the market because of lost of market share as this market was in introduction phase and Toyota left a market which was at maturity. Then it is obvious that Toyota has revenue losses due to leaving its concentration and marketing of products to mature market and was busy in developing environmentally free products market in US.
Answer:
Should Marston Manufacturing Company accept or reject the project?
Marston C Company should reject the project because its expected return is lower than Division H's cost of capital.
Since the divisions' risk is so different, and probably their projects are also very different, the company should use different costs of capital to accept of reject the projects based on each division's cost of capital.
Imagine another situation where Division L is evaluating a project that yields 10%. If they used the company's WACC, then they should reject the project, but if they used the division's cost of capital, then they should accept the project (in this case I would recommend accepting it).
Explanation:
Division H's risk = 14%
Division L's risk = 8%
WACC = 11%
