Answer:
Sure grass. And there is a lot of grass. Compete with wild horses, wild pigs, wild goats, wild "golfer's who are way off the fairway. Wild deer are in the forests, wild goats in the hills so buffalo and horses manage the plains and the back nine. So much grass there was no competition...with the wild rabbits. Grass continues to grow. The buffalo move to greener pastures once they mowed down the other fields. When there were Millions of them, they were not starving.
Explanation: Got this from somewhere hoping it helps!
Answer:
Section 3.2Primary Structure: Amino Acids Are Linked by Peptide Bonds to Form Polypeptide Chains. Proteins are linear polymers formed by linking the α-carboxyl group of one amino acid to the α-amino group of another amino acid with a peptide bond (also called an amide bond).
Answer:
Few crosses
The complexity of cat genetics
Crosses not controlled by the researcher
Explanation:
The purpose of this question is to determine why Megor Grendel is less famous than that of Gregor Mendel.
Gregor Mendel examined pea plants, which have a number of benefits for deducing genetic rules, including:
- The researcher has total control over the crosses.
- Because the peas have both self and cross-fertilization, it is possible to alter the crosses in the simplest way possible.
- Pea plants may be examined for a greater series of generations than cats or other animals.
- Because plant genetics is not overly complicated, several traits may be investigated at the same period.
As a result, the primary factors why Megor Grendel's experiments are not well-known:
- The presence of only a few crossings: It is impossible to establish a genetic theory with such a small number of crossings on the test subject of the organism.
- Cat genetics is too complicated therefore, the fur gene color on the X-chromosome, a characteristics mosaic inheritance. As a result, It is much too complicated to deduce an inheritance pattern.
- Crossings that the researcher cannot fully control. Unlike plants, crosses in animals cannot be totally controlled by the researcher.
As a result, it is impossible to draw any conclusions from them.
I believe it should match as the following...
sight in whales -----> eyeballs in cavefish
balance in monkeys -----> tailbone in humans
attachment point for limbs in frogs -----> pelvis bone in whales