This may not be the best but here’s how I would do it.
Counterclaim #1:
Some would argue that women should not be allowed to serve combat positions in the United States military because they don't possess the strength requirements
for difficult tasks.
Evidence #1: (This section looks good I think)
According to the text, "The Army's
own research indicates that the vast
majority of women do not possess
the lean mass necessary to meet the
strength requirements for very heavy
and heavy physical tasks"
(Fredenberg 5).
Despite the fact that women do lack the strength requirements for very heavy physical tasks, they should still be allowed to serve combat positions in the United States military. When in groups with men, they raise the team's collective intelligence which improves combat performance in the United States military.
Note: These are just my suggestions. This isn’t final. You may make adjustments accordingly. Hope you find this somewhat helpful. Good luck.
What do you mean I’m confused
Answer:
It's stories tend to belong to a particular culture.
Answer:
doing a skill or solving a problem yourself.
Explanation:
Answer:
- Barrett, Leigh. "Snow Removal Woes." Hartford Times-Dispatch 12 January 2012: B12. Print.
Explanation:
According to MLA(Modern Language Association) format begins with the author's last name followed by the last name of the author, title of the article, newspaper title, city, date of publication, and print. An illustration of a citation of a newspaper article would be as follows:
"Last, First Middle, 'Title of the article'. 'Title of the newspaper'.(City). Date. Month Year of Publishing. Page(s). print."
As per this format, the correct citation using MLA guidelines would be as:
"Barrett, Leigh. 'Snow Removal Woes.' Hartford Times-Dispatch 12 January 2012: B12. Print.".
