Ask question

Ask question

All categories

3 years ago

7

Ramiya is using the quadratic formula to solve a quadratic equation. Her equation is x = after substituting the values of a, b,

and c into the formula. Which is Ramiya’s quadratic equation? Quadratic formula: x = 0 = x2 + 3x + 2 0 = x2 – 3x + 2 0 = 2x2 + 3x + 1 0 = 2x2 – 3x + 1

1 answer:

Stels [109]3 years ago

3 0

Answer:

this is the answer

0 = x2 + 3x + 2

Step-by-step explanation:

You might be interested in

#1 #2 #3 & #4 thank you

lubasha [3.4K]

I only (sort of) know 3 and 4

3. Andle 1 is an example of an angle bigger than
${90}^{o} c$
I don't know what you call it.

4. If you have a straight line, both angles (or more) added up need to be
${180}^{o} c$
so if angle 1 is 129, 180-129=51
angle 2 is
${51}^{o} c$

If 1 is what is the relationship between the two angles, then maybe the answer is that they both added up need to be 180 degress (?)

And 2 is probably the same as 3 but with angle 2, angle two is an example of an angle smaller than 90 degrees

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Erika and Bradley want to hike the big cypress trail. they will hike a total of 75 miles. If Erika and Bradley plan to hike for

ahrayia [7]

They will hike 6.25 miles a day

4 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Help 20 points helpppppppp math helps 20 points no linos or imma report you.

bagirrra123 [75]

Answer:

Not a right triangle

Step-by-step explanation:

We can figure out if it is a right triangle or not by using the pythagorean theorem.

a^2 + b^2 = c^2

In this case a and b are 16 and 18

In order for it to be a right triangle, c has to equal 34, in this problem.

16^2 + 18^2 = c^2

= 580^2

= $\sqrt{580}$ = 24.0832

Since 24.0832 does not equal 34, this is not a right triangle

5 0

3 years ago

The USDA conducted tests for salmonella in produce grown in California. In an independent sample of 252 cultures obtained from w

Marat540 [252]

Answer:

The decision rule is

Fail to reject the null hypothesis

The conclusion is

There no sufficient evidence to show that the proportion of salmonella in the region’s water differs from the proportion of salmonella in the region’s wildlife

Step-by-step explanation:

From the question we are told that

The first sample size is $n_1 = 252$

The number that tested positive is $k_1 = 18$

The second sample size is $n_2 = 476$

The number that tested positive is $k_2 = 20$

The level of significance is $\alpha = 0.01$

Generally the first sample proportion is mathematically represented as

$\^ p _1 = \frac{k_1 }{ n_1 }$

=> $\^ p _1 = \frac{18 }{ 252 }$

=> $\^ p _1 = 0.071$

Generally the second sample proportion is mathematically represented as

$\^ p _2 = \frac{k_2 }{ n_2 }$

=> $\^ p _2 = \frac{20 }{ 476}$

=> $\^ p _2 = 0.042$

The null hypothesis is $H_o : p_1 - p_2 = 0$

The alternative hypothesis is $H_a : p_1 - p_2 \ne 0$

Generally the test statistics is mathematically represented

$z = \frac{ \^ p_1 - \^ p_2 - ( p_ 1 - p_2 )}{ \sqrt{\frac{\^ p_1 (1-\^ p_1)}{ n_1 } + \frac{\^ p_2 (1-\^ p_2)}{ n_2 } } }$

=> $z = \frac{ 0.071 - 0.042 - 0 }{ \sqrt{\frac{0.071 (1-0.071)}{ 252 } + \frac{0.042 (1-\^ 0.042)}{ 476 } } }$

=> $z = 1.56$

From the z table the area under the normal curve to the right corresponding to 1.56 is

$P(Z > 1.56 ) =0.05938$

Generally the p-value is mathematically represented as

$p-value = 2 * P(Z > 1.56 )$

=> $p-value = 2 * 0.05938$

=> $p-value = 0.1188$

From the value obtained we see that $p-value > \alpha$ hence

The decision rule is

Fail to reject the null hypothesis

The conclusion is

There no sufficient evidence to show that the proportion of salmonella in the region’s water differs from the proportion of salmonella in the region’s wildlife

5 0

2 years ago

Which expression is equivalent to the following complex fraction? StartFraction 2 Over x EndFraction minus StartFraction 4 Over

aliina [53]

Answer:

its A

Step-by-step explanation:

8 0

3 years ago