There are good arguments on both sides as to when and how fast to reopen the economy. In my view, the answer will vary state by state and industry by industry. There’s also an enormous amount of uncertainty as to exactly how to determine the optimal policy. In that environment, there’s a great advantage to having these decisions be made at as local a level as possible. Thus, while I suspect that Sweden’s current policy is not optimal, that Nordic country is doing a great service to Europe by providing evidence on the consequences of an alternative policy path.
Giving too much power to any one person is dangerous, especially when that person might be influenced by political considerations that go beyond the best interest of the country as a whole:
That’s not to say Trump’s views are necessary wrong; rather that the procedure he uses to reach decisions is not reliable. Thus I’d still favor local control even if in one particular case you could convince me that the views of the person who happened to be president at the time were superior to the views of the average mayor or governor. In the long run, competition between states will produce better governance than central planning.
Answer:
The correct answer is: With the theory of discontinous development.
Explanation:
In developmental psychology, one of the most important questions is whether the individual's development is a continuous or discontinuous process.
The theorist's that argue that development occurs in a continuous manner propose that human development occurs as a gradual process across the life-span, whereas theorist's that believe that development occurs in a discontinuous manner argue that development occurs in stages, where individuals being able to elicit certain behaviors in certain clear and definite stages.
In this particular case, Roger believes his infant daughter is going through very distinct stages of development and is suddenly, upon turning six months old, able to do far more than she could at 5½ months.
This perspective is consistent with the discontinuous approach to development.
With his parents, Joel was employing the door-in-the-face compliance technique.
A compliance tactic that is frequently researched in social psychology is the door-in-the-face approach. The persuader makes a sizable request that the respondent will probably reject in an effort to get them to agree, kind of like metaphorically slamming a door in the persuader's face.
In the door-in-the-face method, compliance is improved by making an incredibly difficult request first, followed by a target request that is genuinely wanted.
An illustration of this would be if you refused a friend's request to borrow an excessive amount of money, only for them to later ask for a lower amount and receive your approval. The door-in-the-face tactic is frequently employed to get individuals to make a financial contribution.
To learn more about door-in-the-face technique
brainly.com/question/29380131
#SPJ4
The answer is: conditioned stimulus (CS)
Conditioned stimulus refers to the neutral stimulus that trigger a specific response after being associated for a prolonged period of time with unconditioned stimulus.
In the case above:
- the toilet flush is previously a neutral stimulus that does not trigger any response.
- The toilet flush later on paired with unconditioned stimulus (hot water) that make jeff scream in pain
- Because of this, the toilet flush become a conditioned stimulus. This make jeff associate the toilet flush with hot water and make him twitch whenever he hear toilet flush while bathing.
Answer:
Four(4) seconds.
Explanation:
<u>Under normal driving conditions, in a clear weather with good visibility and dry roads</u>, a driver driving a normal sized vehicle is advised to stay at least two seconds behind the vehicle in front.
However for a 30 foot bus which is heavier than a normal sized vehicle, and takes longer to come to a stop when the brakes are applied, <u>the driver is advised to stay at least four seconds behind the vehicle in front.</u>
