Answer:
This statement is CORRECT: <u>One can keep adding premises to inductive arguments to make them go from strong to weak, then back to strong again, etc.</u>
Explanation:
The inductive reasoning is based on how the the premises are built, in order for them to lead us to a conclusion. This is why building the right premises can lead to a week or strong argument.
The process of builing a inductive argument is based on specific observations or statements into more general aspects. Although strong premises can lead to strong arguments, they do not garantee the conclusion would be true.
In logic, inductive argument it is not classify as valid or invalid, it is strong or weak according to the premises. The premises can be testable for instance, or they can come from observation.
<u>Answer:</u>
Option(a)
Matters that require action of both the House and Senate, but do not require the power of law or the signature of the President are called concurrent resolutions.
<u>Explanation:</u>
Concurrent resolutions require both house approval before being passed. It is used to amend or make laws that carry the interest of both the house.
They are appointed special letters like “H.Con.Res” and a unique number. Therefore it states that the signature of president is not required for the matters.
Answer:
Roman rulers were seen as "Gods" so they wanted to be worshipped as if they were.
Explanation:
Why not watch the video for starters
