Answer:
correct answer is option a and d
The correct answer is "students' ability to master whatever they seek to learn". This is the only option that states a truly motivating experience, since the ability to master whatever someone wants is believing in yourself which ultimately leads to motivation. Multiple studies have proved that students positive thoughts lead to better grades through motivation.
<u>Answer</u>:
C) Taney can not deny Scott citizenship because it is federal right.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
The counterclaim is the opposite view of the claim statement. The counterclaim showing the strong viewpoint of your research that you have done thorough research and even considered the other's viewpoint also. With the supporting evidence, the researcher can use the counterclaim supporting evidence. The claim never goes unsupported. The credible source could be the newspaper, websites, encyclopedia, and many more resources are there to support the claim.
Answer: A. High- High
Explanation: Ethical dissonance as such arises due to inconsistencies in attaining and maintaining a moral image of oneself and being tempted to exploit some unethical situation for the sake of personal gain. In other words, it is the interaction of the company / organisation and the individual with the aim of adapting the individual and the organisation in different possible situations and scenarios. It is a two-way process because the ethics of an individual influences the organisation, simply the individual enters his / her ethics. Also the ethics of the organisation influences the behaviour of the individual.
Of the four possible fit models / options, high-high is one of two fit options that have a high person-organisation fit. So this is a model that provides a fit relationship between the organisation and the individual. When an individual has a high level of ethics, and organisation too, fit with an organisation of course high. That's the case here.
There is another high fit, therefore the agreement of organisations and individuals, but this is not the case here, when a person is of low ethics. Then for that individual it is a high fit of course if it is also a low ethics organisation, such an organisation suits a low ethics individual.
The other two cases of fit are when there is a low level of fit between the organisation and the individual.
