1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
m_a_m_a [10]
3 years ago
11

Which type of auto insurance protects your own car against damage from auto accidents?

Business
1 answer:
DerKrebs [107]3 years ago
8 0
D. Collision
Correct answer
You might be interested in
If the world's population increased exponentially from 5.937 billion in 1998 to 6.771 billion in 2008 and continued to increase
Vaselesa [24]

Answer:

The world's population would have been 7.1137 billion in 2012, and this is 0.0437 billion (i.e. 7.1137 - 7.07 = 0.0437) higher compared to the population reference bureau estimate of 7.07 billion in July 2012.

Explanation:

This can be computed using the following exponential formula:

P(t) = P(0)a^t ............................ (1)

Where;

P(t) = World population in year t.

P(0) = World population in year 0 which is 1998 = 5.937 billion

a = base = ?

t = number of years

Substituting the value into equation (1), we have:

P(t) = 5.937 * a^t .......................................... (2)

Since we have 10 years from 1998 to 2008 (i.e. 2008 - 1998 = 10), we have:

P(t) = P(10) = World population in 2008 = 6.771 billion

t = 10

Substituting the value into equation (2) and solve for a, we have:

6.771 = 5.937 * a^10

a^10 = 6.771 / 5.937

a^10 = 1.1405

a = \sqrt[10]{1.405}

a = 1.013

Since we have 14 years from 1998 to 2012 (i.e. 2012 - 1998 = 14), we now have:

P(t) = P(14) = World population in 2012 = ?

P(0) = World population in year 0 which is 1998 = 5.937 billion

a = 1.013 as already calculated above

t = 14

Substituting the value into equation (1), we have:

P(14) = 5.937 * 1.013^14

P(14) = 5.937 * 1.192

P(14) = 7.1137 billion

Therefore, the world's population would have been 7.1137 billion in 2012, and this is 0.0437 billion (i.e. 7.1137 - 7.07 = 0.0437) higher compared to the population reference bureau estimate of 7.07 billion in july 2012.

6 0
4 years ago
DuBois, Inc. announces a large stock dividend of 65% of the 4.96 million outstanding shares of common stock. The current price p
Karolina [17]

Answer:

Option (B) is correct.

Explanation:

Dividend per share:

= (65% of Par value of the stock)

= (65% × 0.01)

= $0.0065

Hence, the total dividend:

= (Dividend per share × outstanding shares of common stock)

= (0.0065 × 4.96 million)

= $32,240

Hence, the dividend would cause a decrease in retained earnings.

Therefore, the correct option is B.

6 0
3 years ago
you texpect to receive a payout from a trust fund in 3 years. The payout will be for $11000. You plan to invest the money at an
MrMuchimi

Answer:

11.68 years

Explanation:

For computing the number of years first we have to applied the NPER formula i.e to be shown in the attachment below:

Given that,  

Present value = $11,000

Future value = $19,000

Rate of interest = 6.5%

PMT = $0

The formula is shown below:

= NPER(Rate;PMT;-PV;FV;type)

The present value come in negative

So, after applying the above formula, the number of years is 8.68

Now after 3 years, it would be

= 8.68 + 3

= 11.68 years

3 0
4 years ago
By changing a standard from "be nice to customers" to "greet every customer, and if possible by name," a services marketing mana
KiRa [710]

Answer:

a measurable goal

Explanation:

A measurable goal is a part of the S.M.A.R.T goals that brings structure and trackability into your goals and objective.

By greeting and possibly knowing customers names the services marketing manager can to be able to attract more customers not just by understanding what the customer needs but being able to relate available product or services to them.

By so doing the service marketing manager can be able to measure what exactly he/she has achieved after providing the required service to the customer

4 0
3 years ago
Consider the case of BTR Co.: BTR Co. has 9% annual coupon bonds that are callable and have 18 years left until maturity. The bo
valentinak56 [21]

Answer:

Yield to maturity is 7.93%

Yield to call is  7.83%

Explanation:

I calculated both the yield to maturity and yield to call using the rate formula in excel which is =rate(nper,pmt,pv,-fv)

nper is the year to maturity and year to call of 18 years and 8 years respectively.

pmt is the periodic coupon payment is 9%*1000=$90 in each case.

pv is the present value in each  case of $1100.35

The future value which is the redemption value is $1000 for yield to maturity and $1060 for yield to call

Find attached detailed calculation

Download xlsx
5 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • Martinez Company’s relevant range of production is 7,500 units to 12,500 units. When it produces and sells 10,000 units, its ave
    13·1 answer
  • Equipment, beginning of year $ 340,000 Equipment, end of year 420,000 Accumulated depreciation, beginning of year 190,000 Accumu
    9·1 answer
  • Magenta Company purchased a machine from Pink Corporation on October 31, 2018. In payment for the $288,000 purchase, Magenta iss
    15·1 answer
  • You have just reviewed the financial statements of Penelope's Candy Store (PCS). You have determined that PCS has a Profit Margi
    15·1 answer
  • Future Motors is expected to pay a $3.30 a share annual dividend next year. Dividends are expected to increase by 2.75 percent a
    6·1 answer
  • assume that autonomous consumption is $1610 billion and disposable income is $11,200 billion. Using the consumption function, ca
    12·1 answer
  • Define the role of the mathematical concepts of maximization and equilibrium in microeconomic theory.
    13·1 answer
  • Once you graduate from a college or university, you have to pay a fee to take advantage of their career services. False True
    14·1 answer
  • Parmesan Company uses the direct method for its statement of cash flow. It reports the following information regarding the year
    9·1 answer
  • an employee is found to have grossly mistreated a client, which the employee has never done before. what consequence should be a
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!