1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Vikentia [17]
3 years ago
7

How can a historian determine whether a claim is valid?

History
1 answer:
kondor19780726 [428]3 years ago
8 0
The correct answer is <span>Evaluate the evidence used to support it

They need to examine how valid the evidence is and whether  there's bias in the claim as well as in the evidence. As long as these terms are fulfilled, a historic claim can be made valid. Other people can present counterclaims with their own evidence which is when they revise both claims and find what the actual truth is.</span>
You might be interested in
GIVING BRAINLIEST
Alenkinab [10]

Answer:

Dor C

Francis Lubbock's actions affected Texas' history when he mobilized a frontier regiment of cavalry to combat a group of Indians. The relationship with the tribes was no good. Lubbock tried to expand the industrial resources to activate the economy. He also sold U.S. bonds that were acquired in 1850, because the treasure vault was depleted. Lubbock considered liable for military service all the men from 16 to 60 years old. After his tenure, he joined the Confederate Army in November 1863.  

Francis Richard Lubbock was the governor of Texas from 1861 to 1863.

4 0
3 years ago
The way that cartographers show the round Earth in a flat picture is known as a A. projection. B. parallel. C. scale.
sattari [20]
A) it is known as a projection
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Please help History questions.
zimovet [89]

Answer:

The two themes I choose:

- <u>Separation of Powers</u>

The "Separation of Powers" states that governmental powers are to be evenly split between "x" amount of branches, x being determined by the Founding Fathers. Each of these branches are given a certain power (or job) that they need to do. For example, The Powers were separated and given to 3 branches:

Executive Branch: This branch is has the power to create a bill, as well as veto, line-veto, give ideas on what to change in a bill, create diplomatic relations with countries, ask congress to start wars, set up Judicial Judges.

Legislative Branch: This branch has the power to create bills, pass the bill, declare war, regulate commerce, control taxation and spending policies, veto or approve Judicial Judges.

Judicial Branch: This branch has the power to impeach Presidents, declare a law or bill as unconstitutional, have the last word on cases that reaches the Supreme Court.

- <u>Checks and Balances</u>

As stated above, there are 3 branches. Each of these branches (I will reiterate what i said) have the powers over the other, so as to not be able to overstep their bounds. Think of it as a triangle, in which they have more power and less power than the others.

<u>Executive Branch</u>:

<u>Powers</u>:

Veto/Pass Bills

Instate Judges

Start relations with other countries

<u>Weakness</u>:

Can be impeached

Veto can be overturned by Congress; Bills passed can be overturned by the Supreme Court

Must ask Congress to start wars if relations turn sour

<u />

<u>Legislative Branch:</u>

<u>Powers</u>:

Able to pass laws

Able to declare war

Able to regulate country and foreign commerce

Able to control taxes and how the government spends its funds

<u>Weakness</u>:

Congressmen & women can be replaced

Laws passed can be vetoed/declared unconstitutional

<u>Judicial Branch</u>:

<u>Powers</u>:

Life long term if appointed unless... (which would be put in weakness)

Able to declare laws unconstitutional

Able to have final word in how laws would be interpreted

<u>Weaknesses:</u>

Judges can be replaced

Rulings can be changed if the law is changed later on

4 0
3 years ago
The Warren Court ruled that official prayer in public schools is unconstitutional because it violates the right to criticize the
liubo4ka [24]

The correct answer is B) the clause barring the government from establishing a religion.

The Warren Court ruled that official prayer in public schools is unconstitutional because it violates the clause barring the government from establishing a religion.

We are referring to the case Engel v. Vitale that started on April 3, 1962, and ended on June 25, 1962. The Supreme Court decision was that it was unconstitutional to have an official prayer in school and asked to say it aloud in the public school premises. Chief Justice Eral Warren considered that this violated the Establishment Clause of the 1st Amendment.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What contributions did roman government make to rise democracy?
rusak2 [61]
B) they were the first to practice democracy
4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why did the us think pearl harbor was more likely to suffer sabotage instead of a military attack?
    11·1 answer
  • How did increased wealth influence ancient civilizations?
    15·1 answer
  • Which traits characterize a laissez-faire capitalist economic system
    7·1 answer
  • Westward expansion that resulted in the destruction and removal of native american tribes was one political and moral issue that
    11·1 answer
  • My life savings seem like a paltry amount to some people I know.
    5·1 answer
  • Which type of law determines which actions are considered a crime? A. Criminal law B. Constitutional law C. Military law D. Civi
    13·2 answers
  • What are the Pros of dictorship
    6·1 answer
  • 7. Why is support for the Electoral College greater in small population states than it is in larger population states?
    13·1 answer
  • Explain the consequences of government policy during Reconstruction on society from 1865 to 1877
    15·1 answer
  • Protein deficiency can result in damage to connective tissue and bones, metabolic malfunctions,
    10·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!