Answer:
B
Explanation:
From 1966 onward, African American leaders began objecting
to the war as it became clear that both the war and the funding it required were hurting their struggle
for equality. Clear, statistical evidence of racial bias within the military, especially the high
casualty rates and draft rates of Black soldiers, angered and emboldened the radical activists in the
movement, which had previously been kept in check by the promise of legislative change.
Moderates of the civil rights movement avoided condemning the disparate statistics within the
military, in order to maintain support for President Johnson and his Great Society. The explicitly
revolutionary groups, largely motivated by the disproportionate statistics in the military, opposed
the Vietnam War and the government that perpetuated it on anticolonial and antiracist grounds,
thus breaking the consensus of civil rights organizations because of a differing perception of
racism in the military
Base on the question and in my further research, I would say that the answer would be that b<span>oth sides wanted to gain something. Due to the Compromise. The slave trade was abolished in the District of Columbia. The Territory of New Mexico and the Territory of Utah were organized under the rule of popular sovereignty. And the Fugitive Slave Act was passed.</span>
Answer:
Control of the Mississippi River during the American Civil War was an economic and psychological factor for both the North and the South.
Answer:
Segregation in America. Or the reconstruction era after the american civil war
Explanation:
Right after slavery was abolished in 1865(ish) Jim Crow laws, Separate but equal ruling in plessy v. Ferguson
Answer:
The answer is describes the legislative branch of the government :)
