1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Murljashka [212]
3 years ago
15

A.

History
2 answers:
Annette [7]3 years ago
5 0
A would be the most reasonable answer
lana66690 [7]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

A

Explanation:

definitely not a pure democracy or a central government that would threaten people freedom

You might be interested in
List two ways life was similar now and 100 years ago
marysya [2.9K]
100 years ago use boat, we also use boat now:)
3 0
4 years ago
All of the following are true about Louis-Michel Aury EXCEPT:
Serhud [2]

Answer:

B

Explanation:

tbh im god

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Whats the relationship between a person's point of view and biases?
Juli2301 [7.4K]
A person's point of view will make their answer a non biases answer. simply because they view something a certain way.
5 0
3 years ago
First to answer gets brainliest
Nezavi [6.7K]

Answer:

2

Explanation:

Because if you add 1  to 8 you get 9 then subtract 9 by 7 then and your answer is 2

5 0
3 years ago
Why do historians needs to be careful about being unbiased when presenting historical information
kap26 [50]

Answer:

Explanation:

The problem is they don't. One day you will take a history class that talks about Hiroshima or the Holocaust. They were both tragedies of a kind that is almost impossible to record with no bias.

But what would happen if you read the history from another point of view. Suppose, which I don't think has been done in any school in North America, you were to read about Hiroshima from the point of view of the Japanese. What have they said about it? What will they teach their children? What is the folklore about it from their point of view? Undoubtedly their best historians will record it without bias, but will be the same as what we read? I'm not entirely sure.

That does not answer your question, but I have grave doubts that it is possible. Personal bias always comes into everything. I will say this about your question: we must do our best to present the facts in an unbiased manner. That's important because we need to have a true picture of what happened. Many times it is because historians don't want humanity committing the same errors as the events they are trying to make sense of.

So far we have not dropped an atomic weapon on anyone else. But there have been holocausts after the European one. What have we learned? That six million is a number beyond our understanding, and we have not grasped the enormity of the crime, bias or no bias.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Please help meeeeeeeeeeeeeee
    15·2 answers
  • WHAT ARE THE BASIC SKILLS IN TENNIS
    15·2 answers
  • Which Roman Emperor is known for his efforts to protect and secure the boundaries of the Empire?
    12·2 answers
  • What is most clearly the impact of Bacon’s use of the phrases “by pains men come to greater pains” and “by indignities men come
    8·1 answer
  • Is it possible for the U.S. to not only stay out of European affairs, but also the affairs of all other countries today? Explain
    5·1 answer
  • Before the Berlin Conference, how much of Africa was independent (under local control)?
    13·1 answer
  • Will give brainliest !!! help. what was the historical context of the code of hammurabi ?
    8·1 answer
  • ↝↝Please help
    15·2 answers
  • What was the significance of John Hancock's signature on the Declaration of Independence?
    14·2 answers
  • Based on the descriptions, determine whether the individuals follow the Theravada or the Mahayana form of Buddhism.
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!