Answer:
The right answers are to consider costs, savings plan and scholarships.
Explanation:
Tara should consider colleges with lower total costs, and also consider living in her parents' home to avoid room and board costs, as this would allow her to continue studying on a low budget.
You should create a savings plan, if you have some money saved, this allows you to earn interest to help pay for your studies.
You should maximize the potential of the scholarships, learning about all those you can apply to and managing your resources to acquire them.
Have a nice day!
The answer in the first space provided is that they can use
the majority floor leader in which they debate on the bill that will contribute
of having to delay or pass the bill. In the second space provided is the
filibuster. This is a vote that the senators used to prevent of voting the
bill.
Answer:
low on the degree of formalization
Explanation:
In management, the degree of formalization measures the extent by which an employees roles or tasks are specific and defined. The higher the degree of formalization, the more standard and regulated the employee's tasks and roles.
In this case, the sales representatives are given a general sales pitch that can be adjusted every time they call a different client. So it is not something standardized.
Answer:
The correct answer is True.
Explanation:
When an intoxicated person enters into a contract, the contract can either be enforceable, meaning held to the fullest extent of the law, or voidable by the intoxicated person. The court will look at two criteria that need to be present in order to make the contract voidable:
-
The intoxication was severe enough that the person entering into the contract was incapacitated.
-
The other party was aware of the intoxication at the time.
A voidable contract, in this instance, is one in which the intoxicated party can end the agreement under certain terms. To expand on the criteria above, in order for the intoxicated person to void the contract, there needs to be adequate proof that one of the following occurred:
-
The intoxicated person consumed enough alcohol or drugs to cause impairment in thinking sufficient enough that he could not understand the legal ramifications of entering into the contract.
-
The other party to the contract knew of the intoxication.