Absolute monarchy in France led to continued acceptance of serfdom, while in England serfdom disappeared.
Constitutional monarchy in England led to representative government without a revolution, while France required a revolution.
Absolutism in France delayed the intellectual Enlightenment, while England's constitutional monarchy fostered the Enlightenment.
England's constitutional monarchy efficiently corrected the ills of poverty, while in France the monarchy ignored the poor.
A turning point usually introduces new people, ideas, and technology which results in different forms of government change in idea and even rebellions. So it can be thought of as a revolution because new things are showing up and change is happening.
Answer:
Frances de sales revived Catholicism in a strongly protestant area.
The Monroe Doctrine, which was adopted by the United States after World War II, called for assisting European nations in fending off communist invasions and revolutions.
<h3>How do Communist revolutions work?</h3>
A proletariat revolution that seeks to oust capitalism in favor of communism is referred to as a communist revolution. This is not always the case, though. Socialism can be seen of as an interim stage between capitalism and communism, depending on the sort of governance. A fundamental tenet of Marxism is the notion that a proletarian revolution is required; according to Marxists, the working class must unite and liberate itself from capitalist exploitation in order to establish a society that is administered by and for the working class. Marxists therefore believe that proletarian revolutions must take place in all nations.
According to Leninism, a vanguard must lead a communist revolution.
To know more about communist revolutions visit:
brainly.com/question/23716206
#SPJ4
Answer:
For the British, 73 were killed, 174 were wounded, and 26 were missing. While the colonists lost many minutemen, the Battles of Lexington and Concord were considered a major (American) military victory and displayed to the British and King George III that unjust behavior would not be tolerated.
Explanation:
