Answer:
The correct answer is c) Thornstan, who is writing a book that will be sold in bookstores around the world.
Explanation:
Producers are all people whose function is to create something; there are different types of producers that range from the film producer to the agricultural producer.
The producer is responsible for making a product and then sells it, sometimes with the help of someone else. For example, in the case of Thornstan, he is writing a book for which he becomes a producer since his book is the product, and this book will be sold all over the world with the help of bookstores and the publisher.
<em />
<em>I hope this information can help you.</em>
Answer:
well then you would look after the house
Explanation:
first what ever you do don't brake anything second Keep the house clean don't make any messes third it is always good to lock the doors just to be safe fourth if there was any messes before she left maybe help and to a little more and clean that to
Hope This Helped
Answer:
That is just their views and personal opinions of how they see this world.
Explanation:
Most believe that science is the main source of life and that it is not god nor such thing as a god.
Answer: C. Private Action
Explanation: Private actions are act or actions carried out or perpetrated by individuals, corporations or groups without direct consent or order from the government.
In the scenario above, the breakdown of communism crippled the government and the state was overrun by mafians. At that point, the government could no longer uphold or shield property owners. Therefore, the demands made by the mafian from business owners in other to avoid retribution is called private action in the context of property right.
Bolivar stood apart from his class in ideas, values and vision. Who else would be found in the midst of a campaign swinging in a hammock, reading the French philosophers? His liberal education, wide reading, and travels in Europe had broadened his horizons and opened his mind to the political thinkers of France and Britain. He read deeply in the works of Hobbes and Spinoza, Holbach and Hume; and the thought of Montesquieu and Rousseau left its imprint firmly on him and gave him a life-long devotion to reason, freedom and progress. But he was not a slave of the Enlightenment. British political virtues also attracted him. In his Angostura Address (1819) he recommended the British constitution as 'the most worthy to serve as a model for those who desire to enjoy the rights of man and all political happiness compatible with our fragile nature'. But he also affirmed his conviction that American constitutions must conform to American traditions, beliefs and conditions.
His basic aim was liberty, which he described as "the only object worth the sacrifice of man's life'. For Bolivar liberty did not simply mean freedom from the absolutist state of the eighteenth century, as it did for the Enlightenment, but freedom from a colonial power, to be followed by true independence under a liberal constitution. And with liberty he wanted equality – that is, legal equality – for all men, whatever their class, creed or colour. In principle he was a democrat and he believed that governments should be responsible to the people. 'Only the majority is sovereign', he wrote; 'he who takes the place of the people is a tyrant and his power is usurpation'. But Bolivar was not so idealistic as to imagine that South America was ready for pure democracy, or that the law could annul the inequalities imposed by nature and society. He spent his whole political life developing and modifying his principles, seeking the elusive mean between democracy and authority. In Bolivar the realist and idealist dwelt in uneasy rivalry.
