The English civil war led to the rise of parliament. Hope this helps!
Answer: an’s Tokugawa (or Edo) period, which lasted from 1603 to 1867, would be the final era of traditional Japanese government, culture and society before the Meiji Restoration of 1868 toppled the long-reigning Tokugawa shoguns and propelled the country into the modern era. Tokugawa Ieyasu’s dynasty of shoguns presided over 250 years of peace and prosperity in Japan, including the rise of a new merchant class and increasing urbanization. To guard against external influence, they also worked to close off Japanese society from Westernizing influences, particularly Christianity. But with the Tokugawa shogunate growing increasingly weak by the mid-19th century, two powerful clans joined forces in early 1868 to seize power as part of an “imperial restoration” named for Emperor Meiji. The Meiji Restoration spelled the beginning of the end for feudalism in Japan, and would lead to the emergence of modern Japanese culture, politics and society.
Explanation:
Answer:
A is the correct answer
Explain:
You can easily rule out D because there are still conflicts to this day. Now you have it easier to get the right answer. WW2 was the first truly modern war, in the civil war and evem WW1 they still waited to see the whites of peoples eyes before they fired. And the majority of the battles were actually fought in the north.
Well Britain and France took massive loans from the United States for war supplies. Also the fighting was taking place on French soil which destroyed all the farms and all the farms were fighting the Germans which meant that American farms where needed to grow more crops faster which meant they took out loans and used them to buy tractors to help feed the French and little bit to Britain and also Belgium.
Answer:
Following are the answer to this question:
Explanation:
I will completely change the voting system with no doubt because there is no doubt in eliminates it. I'm 18, and in my short life, I have also seen a three basic right in elections, in which the national election was managed to win by the selected candidate.
- The peoples voting by their will in the elections, in which the common election was lost and a presidential candidate was appointed. This same electoral college can, by its free will, oppose the person's, in which people will appoint a nonethical president, especially unethical in a country that values the freedom to vote and to change so enormously.
- If the United States does not have the right to vote, it's also essentially free to take a voting booth and voice an opinion that perhaps the voting in the voting of the participating universities is might or may not differ.
