Answer: Settlers and tribes both had effects on each other. On many trails headed west, settlers traveled in fear of attack from tribes who would rob or kill members of caravans. Tribes would attack stagecoaches and wagons that traveled across their lands. On the other hand, settlers constantly encroached on tribes’ lands. When settlers drove cattle, built railroads, established trails, and created new settlements, tribes were driven off of their lands. Often, this happened to tribes that had already relocated from other parts of the country to escape settlement. As the two groups fought over land, tribes struggled to get the resources they needed. While both groups profited from each other, both also were harmed by expansion in different ways.
Two roles of magistrate judges are : ( B ) to isuue court orders ( in pre-trial matters ) ; and ( D ) to hear preliminary evidence and decide if a case should be brought to trial. Magistrate judges are appointed by vote of federal district judges for terms of eight years; they can be reelected.
Explanation:
1. I <u>agree </u>with the Sitting Bull's quote. It makes me feel a bit upset, Sitting Bull conveyed great emotion within the 8 sentence that are there.
2. I do <u>not </u>think western settlers could have coexisted with tribes they encountered due to how persistent Sitting Bull was for fighting for the Native American's freedom from the Western Settlers.
3. I do <u>not </u>think Native Americans should have been put on reservations. The Native Americans were there before the Western Settlers were, this is their land.
4. No, I do <u>not </u>think Native Americans should have adapted to settler ways. Native Americans have their own culture which the settlers should not intervene with.
5. The settlers and federal government was <u>not</u> within their rights to conquer Native Americans and take their homelands. The Native Americans have their own rights just as much the settlers did. The homelands were where they lived. They were not above the Native Americans.
Taking into account the statement above: "Look at this map of an imaginary state that has been redistricted.
Based on this map, what conclusion can someone draw about who was most likely in charge of the redistricting?
Party 1
Party 2
neither party"
The answer is: Party 1.
Hope this helps.
<span>i guess the primary was the larger vehiculo and increasing of car productivity</span>
