1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
adoni [48]
3 years ago
11

Thomas Jefferson welcomed the Missouri Compromise as a strong and permanent process to maintain the union.

History
1 answer:
Ne4ueva [31]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

False.

Explanation:

Missouri Compromise brought forth by John Holmes makes Missouri a slave trade and Maine as a free state. It also prohibited slavery north of the 36º 30’ parallel.

Thomas Jefferson and his popular republican party were against this compromise for it threatens the balance of free and slave states. Jefferson expressed his disagreement of the Compromise in his letter to John Holmes, referring to the new Congress law as <em>"the knell of the union [...] hushed for the moment. But this is a reprieve only, not a final sentence."</em> And he wholly disagrees with the division of the American union.

Thus, the <u>correct answer is false for Jefferson did not welcome the Compromise but rather felt it further divided the union. </u>

<u></u>

You might be interested in
PLEASE HELP!!!!!!!!!!!!
Mamont248 [21]
A is poverty b is political reforms
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Peoples lives were largely controlled by the companies they worked for. How would buying on credit from a company store contribu
Alchen [17]
“Owe my soul to the company store”

Buying on credit, from employer, means you will likely fall into a cycle of debt to one supplier. Limiting your ability to make purchases from other vendors.

Or to even look for work in another town/move on. Until you pay of your recurring debts, employer effectively owns you!!

Companies in say mining towns, owned or controlled every business from butcher shop, general stores, the bank etc. A monopoly.
5 0
3 years ago
How did the rights of dalits, or lower-caste Indians, change in democratic India?
krek1111 [17]

The democratized India has forever banned the use of the caste system used by members of the Hindu religion. When the system was allowed, the Dalits were marginalized, had no rights guaranteed and could only perform works related to feces of the people of higher castes .With the end of the caste system, the Dalits should be considered ordinary citizens with equal rights and duties to the rest of the population.

The creation of the Atrocities Prevention Act in 1995 protected the Dalits from discriminating against superior castes. Anyone who disobeys this law would be automatically arrested without bail.


7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Who became president of the confederacy in 1861?
UkoKoshka [18]
Answer to this is Jefferson Davis
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Will give brainliest <br> Read highlighted text on the picture
Leto [7]

Answer:

this is a exam questions do with self

8 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • In three to four sentences, explain some of the factors that cause changes in demand and why it is important for consumers to un
    13·1 answer
  • Which statement best explains why Spain closed most of it's missions in Texas in the 1770's?
    14·1 answer
  • Which statement is true about the aztec people in mexico
    8·1 answer
  • What happened in the past years about impeachment?
    6·1 answer
  • Describe a few of the main roles of the President and give some examples of specific duties he must perform.
    12·2 answers
  • Which term best relates to the government in the us
    12·2 answers
  • Why did Canada got involved in ww1(world war 1) <br>explain
    10·2 answers
  • Construct an argument for which type of
    8·1 answer
  • Right answer only worth 20 points !!
    7·1 answer
  • Question 1 of 10
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!