Hmph..Harvests had been poor and mass hunger a serious danger in 1305-1314; then, in 1315-1322, famine devastated most of Europe<span>. Spring and Summer floods led to crop failures, so that peasants had absolutely no surplus grain to sell at market in fall 1315...
Love, grace..-
</span>
TRUE. The country of Belgium lead Europe in adopting the industrial technology of Britain.
<span>The industrial revolution on the European continent began in Belgium. Belgium had traditionally enjoyed a vibrant trading tradition for many years. Flanders had a flourishing textile production . Walloon had an increasing growth of iron processing. South and East of Belgium contains large coal reserves. These factors, together with the creation of the steam engine, were keys to the growth of Industrial Revolution.</span>
The Industrial Revolution brought a shift from cottage industry production to mass production from factories with various powerful and specialized machinery. It resulted to the improvement of transportation, communication, and banking systems.
His central teachings, that the Bible is the central source of spiritual authority and that deliverance is reached through faith and not doing, shaped the nature of Protestantism.
- Although Luther was required of the Catholic Church, he alienated himself from the radical successors who took up his mantle.
- Luther's belief in reason by faith led him to question the Catholic Church's rules of self-indulgence. He objected not only to the church's desire but to the very idea of indulgences.
- He did not acknowledge the Catholic Church had the power to forgive people sins.
<h3>What were Martin Luther's views about the Bible?</h3>
Luther and other Reformers reasserted the power of the Scripture unaided, as opposed to practice and church hierarchy. They maintained that redemption comes by grace alone, through faith alone, in Christ independently, to the glory of God alone.
To learn more about Luther's belief, refer
brainly.com/question/885736
#SPJ4
Answer:
Explanation:
The meaning of democracy – from the Greek word – demokratia – is “rule by the people”. As a system of government, it is now almost universally commended. To describe a country, or a policy, as “undemocratic” is to criticise it and those countries that are undemocratic are continually urged towards reform.
Yet, democracy is a complex and contested notion. Moreover, until relatively recently, the idea of rule by the people was as much (if not more) feared as loved. The ancient Greek philosopher Plato, for example, related democracy to the rule of unbridled and untutored passions over cool and reflective reason. Invoking a now common image of the ship of state, Plato asks whether a real ship in stormy waters is sensibly governed by a trained captain who has knowledge of seamanship and navigation or by the crew who have no specialist training. This seems a good question, and although such views are no longer part of the currency of intellectual thought, democrats continue to worry about the role of civic education, for example, in moulding a population so that its members do not just rule, but rule by informed decision making.
