Answer:
.....
good question. Wait for the answer
Explanation:
Answer:
$12,841.03
Explanation:
Given:
Initial Investment = $50,000
1st year expected income = $19,000
2nd year expected income = $25,000
3rd year expected income = $30,000
Expected rate of return = 8% = 8/100 = 0.08
Net present value = ?
Computation of net present value:
Net present value = 
Net present value = $112,841.03
Answer:
The answer is below;
Explanation:
b. Allowance for Doubtful Accounts Dr.$4,000
Bad Debts Cr.$4,000
c. Bad Debt Expense Dr.$5,000
Account Receivable Cr.$5,000
d. 1)Account Receivable Dr.$5,000
Bad Debt Expense Cr.$5,000
2)Cash Dr.$5,000
Account Receivable Cr.$,5000
It is different because people actually have the option of correcting the information or putting false things too.
Answer: option 3
Explanation:
Background to the case:
The cases involving the explosion of Ford Pinto's due to a defective fuel system design led to the debate of many issues, most centering around the use by Ford of a cost-benefit analysis and the ethics surrounding its decision not to upgrade the fuel system based on this analysis.
Basis of analysis:
Should a risk/benefit analysis be used in situations where a defect in manufacturing could lead to seriously bodily harm and even worse death, such as in the Ford Pinto situation?
Rule of the court:
There hasn’t really been a definite decision about the case and arguments both for and against such an analysis have been made. It is an economically efficient method which has been accepted by courts for numerous years, however, juries may not always agree, so companies should take this into account.
Discretion is expected to be used.
