No no I don't think it's a bad idea because well you know like in the air if you going to build a castle you need like airplanes in a lot of fans but to do that you have to buy it like $1,100 so I would think that you should use nothing but you shouldn't build a castle in the air because if you build a castle in there how you going to get up there what are you going to use to build what what stuff you going to use I was just build a castle on the ground not in the air
To be honest I don't think it is a bad idea because you know in the air if you going to build a castle you need airplanes and a lot of fans, but to do that you have to buy the things to make it happen and hat will cost around $1,100 dollars, so in my opinion you should not anything, but you shouldn't build a castle in the air because castles don't belong in the air like how you going to get up?, then what are you going to use to build to keep it in the air, so keep it traditional and just let the castles stay I on the ground not in the air, but it was worth a shot.
A run-on sentence usually occurs when two separate sentences or clauses are improperly combined. However, unlike sentence fragments, run-on sentences can still be technically grammatically correct. So technically the are bad.
The answer is: A, B and D. Soliloquy comes from Latin <em>solo</em> ( to himself) and <em>loquor</em> (I speak). And it is a literary device used in a drama with the purpose to <em>reveal the thoughts of a character</em> while <em>he talks to himself</em>, without perceiving the presence of another person. It is like thinking outloud, which helps the audience to know what is happening <em> inside the character.</em>
