1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
mel-nik [20]
3 years ago
7

What are the causes of rivalry between the ottoman and safavid empire

History
1 answer:
Maksim231197 [3]3 years ago
8 0
<span>The Ottoman empire was run by Sunni muslims and the Safavids controled by Shi'i muslims. Religious difference was one of the main sources of conflict between the empires. The Ottomans and Safavids also fought over control of Islamic territories and interpretation of Islamic doctrines.</span>
You might be interested in
Was the great compromise greater than than the Three-Fifths compromise?
Setler79 [48]

the answer to the question is yes

3 0
3 years ago
Why was reconstruction of the south likely to be a difficult process?
aleksklad [387]
Due to a ruined economy returning 11/ state back into the union and promoting the right of former slaves
6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is one of the advantages of globalization?
love history [14]

Answer:

B

Explanation:

to improve better communication between two countries

6 0
2 years ago
#1 Do you think that it is a good idea for the different branches of government to be able to have a way to override the other b
tensa zangetsu [6.8K]

Answer:

its good and here is the reason why

Explanation

The intent of separation of powers is to prevent the concentration of unchecked power and to provide for checks and balances, in which the powers of one branch of government is limited by the powers of another branch—to prevent abuses of power and avoid autocracy

8 0
2 years ago
The term "Columbian Exchange" is used to describe the exchange of goods, technology, education, and diseases between the America
harkovskaia [24]

Answer:

Because they had <u>a massive exploration by the mother country</u> (the one responsible by the conquest), <u>which took a considerable part of their goods.</u>

Explanation:

The Latin American colonies were different from the British Colonies (Thirteen Colonies and Canada) <u>because they were explored massively by Portugal and Spain during the three centuries of colonialism.</u> The Iberian countries were following an economic and political idea called <u>Mercantilism</u> which, as the main aspect, was<u> the exploration of a colony, taking the goods and sending it to the mother country. Only a small part was left for the colony.</u> And why those colonies don't rebel against the mother country, you may ask. Because since the very moment the Iberian countries began their colonization, they didn't leave any possibility of revolution, with laws and severe control of the settlers and natives. <u>Any try of revolution or riot was massively dismissed with violence.</u>

7 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • How might political candidates use knowledge of perceptual regions to their advantage?
    10·1 answer
  • Discuss unilateral and multilateral approaches to war
    6·1 answer
  • Will mark brainliest
    9·1 answer
  • Which religious ethnicity did german nazis send to death camps
    12·1 answer
  • Quel est l'intérêt de ce texte pour<br>un historien qui étudie la traite?<br>​
    11·2 answers
  • Why did the Church make sure to silence Galileo?
    9·1 answer
  • Gibbons v. Ogden was mainly about the power of Congress to
    8·2 answers
  • Which statement describes Thomas Paine's most important contribution to the American Revolution?
    12·1 answer
  • How did the British portray the Germans in propaganda?
    11·1 answer
  • How does thomas jefferson prove his argument
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!