The question is incomplete. This is the complete question:
Which of the following is not a permissible circumstance under which to implement a prior restraint, under Near v. Minnesota?
a. obscene publications.
b. Fighting words likely to promote immense violence.
c. Obstruction of military recruitment.
d. Publication of troop movement in the time of war.
Answer:
The answer is b. Fighting words likely to promote immense violence.
Explanation:
Although it is possible for certain words to cause immense violence when used in publications, under Near v. Minnesota (a United States Supreme Court decision which declared that prior restraints on publication violated the freedom of speech and press) it is still not permissible to implement a prior restraint, even when publications use fighting words that are likely to promote immense violence.
<u>Answer</u>:
Since the mid 1970s, the United States had a significant trade deficit.
<u>Explanation</u>:
The U.S had undergone a trade deficit since the 1970s. This has been contributed to the fact that they have been importing way more supplies and goods than the other countries were buying from the Americans. These imports have affected the native industries. Also, the demand for American products went down drastically and thus contributing to the deficit.
While Europe and Great Britain undertook industrialization in the 18th century, Americans started it in the 19th century-this delay resulted in the US depending upon imported goods and also in US struggling to meet Europe's levels of export.
B is your answer for this one.
<em><u>lengua</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>maya</u></em><em><u> </u></em>
Explanation:
<em>l</em><em>a</em><em> </em><em>v</em><em>e</em><em>r</em><em>d</em><em>a</em><em>d</em><em> </em><em>n</em><em>o</em><em> </em><em>s</em><em>e</em><em> </em><em>p</em><em>e</em><em>r</em><em>o</em><em> </em><em>s</em><em>i</em><em> </em><em>m</em><em>e</em><em> </em><em>d</em><em>a</em><em>s</em><em> </em><em>c</em><em>o</em><em>r</em><em>o</em><em>n</em><em>i</em><em>t</em><em>a</em><em> </em><em>t</em><em>e</em><em> </em><em>r</em><em>e</em><em>s</em><em>p</em><em>o</em><em>n</em><em>d</em><em>o</em><em> </em><em>b</em><em>i</em><em>e</em><em>n</em><em> </em><em>l</em><em>a</em><em> </em><em>p</em><em>r</em><em>e</em><em>g</em><em>u</em><em>n</em><em>t</em><em>a</em><em> </em><em>q</em><em>u</em><em>e</em><em> </em><em>h</em><em>a</em><em>g</em><em>a</em><em>s</em><em> </em>
Answer:
Trade most directly affect technology of ancient India because, ancient India had a lot of money but it was not very developed, so trading with other countries helped ancient India develop more with technology. I hope this helps. :)
Explanation:
