1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Firdavs [7]
3 years ago
12

PLZZ HELP FAST WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST ANSWER ONLY IF ANSWERED RIGHT!! IF NOT I WILL REPORT YOU!!!

History
1 answer:
Tom [10]3 years ago
7 0
They became more of a fashionable item. most likely got more expensive so you'd only see the rich wearing shoes and it would show the social classes more easily so it might have made some people feel bad about themselfs. before they were only used to keep your feet from being burned from a hot ground or from getting frost bite in winter.
You might be interested in
The voting rights act helped to increase African American voter registration from 29% in 1960 to 65% in 2000
Ainat [17]

Answer:

true

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Workers of a cloth mill fell ill because their workplace does not have proper ventilation and is situated close to the garbage d
notka56 [123]
Safe work environment to employees
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did the Himalayas affect the development of China? When did China first start trading with India? What were their most popul
son4ous [18]

Himalaya's: Isolated China.and gave protection, and water, and minerals.

Trading : As far as I know from when the silk road started ( but this could be wrong)

<em>POPULAR EXPORTS : </em> Jade, Silk, Paper, Porcelain.

<em>Popular Imports : </em>Spices, Glass, AND ALSO :  Buddhism ( from india)

5 0
3 years ago
Why do societies use natural resources (APEX)
77julia77 [94]

Answer:

socieities use natural resources to provide their needs

4 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What impact did the oil industry have on transportation in the United States
Andreyy89

Answer:

North America is experiencing a boom in crude oil supply, primarily due to growing production in the Canadian oil sands and the recent expansion of shale oil production from the Bakken fields in North Dakota and Montana as well as the Eagle Ford and Permian Basins in Texas. Taken together, these new supplies are fundamentally changing the U.S. oil supply-demand balance. The United States now meets 66% of its crude oil demand from production in North America, displacing imports from overseas and positioning the United States to have excess oil and refined products supplies in some regions.

The rapid expansion of North American oil production has led to significant challenges in transporting crudes efficiently and safely to domestic markets—principally refineries—using the nation’s legacy pipeline infrastructure. In the face of continued uncertainty about the prospects for additional pipeline capacity, and as a quicker, more flexible alternative to new pipeline projects, North American crude oil producers are increasingly turning to rail as a means of transporting crude supplies to U.S. markets. Railroads are more willing to enter into shorter-term contracts with shippers than pipelines, offering more flexibility in a volatile oil market. According to rail industry officials, U.S. freight railroads delivered 435,560 carloads of crude oil in 2013 (roughly equivalent to 300 million barrels), compared to 9,500 carloads in 2008. In the first half of 2014, 258,541 carloads of crude oil were delivered. Crude imports by rail from Canada have increased more than 20-fold since 2011. The amount of oil transported by rail may also be influenced by a tight market for U.S.-built tankers. However, if recent oil price declines persist and the price falls below the level at which Bakken producers can cover their costs, some production could be shut in, potentially reducing the volume of oil carried by rail.

While oil by rail has demonstrated benefits with respect to the efficient movement of oil from producing regions to market hubs, it has also raised significant concerns about transportation safety and potential impacts to the environment. The most recent data available indicate that railroads consistently spill less crude oil per ton-mile transported than other modes of land transportation. Nonetheless, safety and environmental concerns have been underscored by a series of major accidents across North America involving crude oil transportation by rail—including a catastrophic fire that caused numerous fatalities and destroyed much of Lac Mégantic, Quebec, in 2013. Following that event, the U.S. Department of Transportation issued a safety alert warning that the type of crude oil being transported from the Bakken region may be more flammable than traditional heavy crude oil.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why did the colonists become hostile toward Great Britain
    5·1 answer
  • Africa's increasing problem of deforestation could MOST likely result in
    10·2 answers
  • What statement best describes the Catholic Church Catholic
    12·1 answer
  • How did the Tang land reform policy strenghthen the central government?
    12·2 answers
  • Why were southerners more threatened by challenges to the institution of slavery than northerners?
    10·1 answer
  • In 1962, President Kennedy claimed the U.S. would have a man on the moon by the end of the decade, how do you think people react
    8·1 answer
  • “[E]very individual, therefore, endeavours as much as he can [to direct his
    13·1 answer
  • Discuss student opinions of the Sedition Act and how Congress and the public sometimes overreact to a
    9·1 answer
  • EXPLAIN USING EVIDENCE how the great depression may have led to WW1?!
    5·1 answer
  • Which of the following landmarks can be found in San Antonio, Texas?
    7·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!