1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
goldenfox [79]
3 years ago
14

which of the following conclusions do U.S. attitudes toward the panama canal during the 20th century support? A.historical conte

xt can only be determined long after and event has passed. B. Biases prevent most people from participating in a changing historical context. C. peoples point of view can change to suit changes in historical context. D.contextualization of a historical event sjould not be changed once it has been made.
History
2 answers:
Strike441 [17]3 years ago
3 0
C.  People's point of view can change to suit changes in historical context.

Allow me to add some explanation about historical context and how that works.

When the Panama Canal was built in the early 1900s, the historical and political context was one of imperialism. President Theodore Roosevelt of the United States used military pressure and warships to force Columbia to recognize Panama's independence, and then arranged with Panama to cede a strip of land to the United States (for $10 million) so that the US could build the canal and control the canal zone for commercial purposes.
By the late 20th century, the historical and political context was much different, and imperialistic control of overseas territories was no longer in vogue.  In 1977, US President Jimmy Carter signed a treaty with Panama which agreed to give over control of the canal to Panama by the end of the century, with transfer of control taking place on December 31, 1999.   
Part of the reason for willingness to make that transfer was that the Panama Canal had become expensive for the United States to maintain and operate -- so that part of the historical context plays in also.  Since Panama took over the canal, they have actually done very well financially with it.  You could check out a good book on the subject,<em> The Big Ditch</em>, by Noel Maurer and Carlos Yu, published by Princeton University Press in 2010.
yuradex [85]3 years ago
3 0
The correct answer would be : C. People's point of view can change to suit changes in historical context
The conclusion that U.S attitudes toward panama canal during the 20th century support the opinion that people's point of view can change depending on the historical context

hope this helps
You might be interested in
Which sentence most clearly describes the resolution in a story?
krok68 [10]

Answer:

a)A member of the jury rises. "Not guilty," she says.

8 0
2 years ago
What was the purpose of the Puritans settling the New England colonies? a. to stabilize the immigrants traveling to the United S
Alinara [238K]

Answer:

c. To practice their religion freely.

Explanation:

The Puritans were immigrants from England who were opposed to the Catholic Church of England and its laws and regulations. Because of their dissent against the Catholic ruling, these Protestants came to America to be free from the constraints under the Church of England.

These Puritans were mostly Protestants who were unable to practice their religion freely. With their new settlement at the New England colonies, they were able to freely enjoy the Protestant religion.

Thus, the correct answer is option c.

5 0
3 years ago
What cultural effect did the Silk Road have on ancient China
Rzqust [24]

Answer:

Explanation:

The Silk Road promoted commodity exchange and cultural. it led to Buddhism one of the religions of the Kushan kingdom reached China and also the  merchant caravans Buddhist monks went from India to Central Asia and China, preaching the new religion. Buddhist monuments were discovered in numerous cities along the Silk Road.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why were slaves important in the colonial economy?
ira [324]
England's southern colonies in North America developed a farm economy that could not survive without slave labor. Many slaves lived on large farms called plantations. These plantations produced important crops traded by the colony, crops such as cotton and tobacco.

And

Throughout the 17th and 18th centuries people were kidnapped from the continent of Africa, forced into slavery in the American colonies and exploited to work as indentured servants and labor in the production of crops such as tobacco and cotton.
8 0
3 years ago
In a market economy, decisions about which goods are produced are based
iren2701 [21]

Answer:

I don't know but I truly think it's A, if it's wrong please tell me the correct answer.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How did the Third Crusade’s peace treaty affect people in the Holy Land?
    14·1 answer
  • What were the Aryan people hoping to find when they left their original homeland? will give brainliest help
    7·2 answers
  • How did the British Act of Union affect Ireland's position in the Great Britain's government?
    14·1 answer
  • Describe the topography of the island visited by Columbus.
    6·1 answer
  • The FDIC (Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation), NRA (National Recovery Administration) , and CCC (Civilian Conservation Corps)
    7·1 answer
  • The U.S. Is an important leader within the United Nations, NATO, The World Court, and the ICRC. True False
    7·1 answer
  • 11. Which African Country Named its Capital After a U.S. President?
    8·1 answer
  • Which best describes the purpose of the American Revolution?
    9·1 answer
  • Who was the only African American to receive the Medal of Honor for service in World War 1?
    12·1 answer
  • Who opened up the Silk Road? Why was this road opened at that time?
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!