1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
goldenfox [79]
3 years ago
14

which of the following conclusions do U.S. attitudes toward the panama canal during the 20th century support? A.historical conte

xt can only be determined long after and event has passed. B. Biases prevent most people from participating in a changing historical context. C. peoples point of view can change to suit changes in historical context. D.contextualization of a historical event sjould not be changed once it has been made.
History
2 answers:
Strike441 [17]3 years ago
3 0
C.  People's point of view can change to suit changes in historical context.

Allow me to add some explanation about historical context and how that works.

When the Panama Canal was built in the early 1900s, the historical and political context was one of imperialism. President Theodore Roosevelt of the United States used military pressure and warships to force Columbia to recognize Panama's independence, and then arranged with Panama to cede a strip of land to the United States (for $10 million) so that the US could build the canal and control the canal zone for commercial purposes.
By the late 20th century, the historical and political context was much different, and imperialistic control of overseas territories was no longer in vogue.  In 1977, US President Jimmy Carter signed a treaty with Panama which agreed to give over control of the canal to Panama by the end of the century, with transfer of control taking place on December 31, 1999.   
Part of the reason for willingness to make that transfer was that the Panama Canal had become expensive for the United States to maintain and operate -- so that part of the historical context plays in also.  Since Panama took over the canal, they have actually done very well financially with it.  You could check out a good book on the subject,<em> The Big Ditch</em>, by Noel Maurer and Carlos Yu, published by Princeton University Press in 2010.
yuradex [85]3 years ago
3 0
The correct answer would be : C. People's point of view can change to suit changes in historical context
The conclusion that U.S attitudes toward panama canal during the 20th century support the opinion that people's point of view can change depending on the historical context

hope this helps
You might be interested in
in your own words, explain how the social structure of society shifted during the Renaissance period.​
Nana76 [90]

Answer: During the Renaissance, the social structure had been reshaped with the abandonment of the feudal system. The feudal system was the combination of the legal, economic, military, and cultural customs that flourished in Medieval Europe between the 9th and 15th centuries. Broadly defined, it was a way of structuring society around relationships that were derived from the holding of land in exchange for service or labor. So in getting rid of the feudal system it paved a new way for peasants and slaves.

Explanation: I hope all of this helps you out :) You've got this!

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
And indeed there will be time To wonder, “Do I dare?” and, “Do I dare?” Time to turn back and descend the stair, With a bald spo
diamong [38]

The correct answer is A. He is indecisive

Explanation:

In this excerpt, Prufrock reflex about his actions, decisions, and identity, especially by communicating his fears and doubts. This can be seen in the questions he asks himself such as "Do I dare?" or "Do I dare Disturb the universe?" that shows he is very indecisive and probably does not have enough confidence to take certain steps or make certain decisions. Also, this indecisiveness is supported by ideas such as "They will say: “How his hair is growing thin" that shows the author is concern about social judgment, and due to this, he cannot decide what to do or he is not completely sure about it.

4 0
3 years ago
Why was Mexican immigration to the U.S. so common during the Mexican Revolution?
valentinak56 [21]
Mexican immigrants wanted to escape poverty, war, turmoil, and even persecution for certain groups
8 0
3 years ago
PLEASE ANSWER!:
True [87]

Answer:

A.

Explanation:

early in the civil war Abraham Lincoln proposed the amanstipation proclamation.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Define the term Annex.<br><br><br><br>What did this term  mean for Mexico?
Eva8 [605]

The All of Mexico Movement (also called All Mexico Movement) was a political movement to expand the United States, so that it would include all of Mexico. It was an expression of Manifest Destiny but it never went into effect.

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What are Cliesthenes reforms??
    5·2 answers
  • Match the following. 1. Some called Rembrandt's technique wizardry 2. One contemporary painter called Rembrandt's paintings a me
    9·2 answers
  • What was the main goal of the military construction act
    10·1 answer
  • In june 1945,the war was almost over.what else did Americans have to be happy about?​
    13·1 answer
  • Which one of the following does NOT describe the European soldier on the Western Front?
    13·1 answer
  • Which of the following describes an economic affect on European imperialism in Africa
    6·1 answer
  • Two causes of ww2 were military build up and hitler's invasion of small countries
    10·1 answer
  • Mahabharata<br> What is this?<br> Lesson 3<br> page 6
    11·1 answer
  • Some say Islam is likely to become the largest religion in the world during the twenty-first century. What are some factors that
    5·2 answers
  • Which Renaissance artist is responsible for this painting
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!