The issue which represents a basic disagreement between Den Republicans is ''Whether monopoly capitalism should be replaced by state
''
Answer: Option A
<u>Explanation:
</u>
Democratic party and the republic party are the two main parties which are in majority in the United States. These two parties are totally against each other and so are the ideologies of the people who vote for these two parties.
The people supporting the democratic party feel that there should be a big government and the power to govern the state should be in the hands of the government where as the republicans feel the opposite where they want to cut the size of the federal government.
Mexico
In the late 1970s vast new oil reserves were discovered in Mexico. This introduced oil as a major source of revenue for the Mexican economy. The discovery made <span> Mexico the eleventh largest producer of oil in the world and the thirteenth largest in terms of net exports.</span>
<span />
Answer:
the bolshevik revolution caused craziness and the revolution turned civil, stalin wanted more industries in the east which meant peasants had to become industrial workers, stalin delivered a speech telling them basically how important they were. and if they did not work then they would "be crushed"
Explanation:
Answer:
I don't know...call me crazy, but I don't think this would be such a bad idea (at least sometime in the future.) With the advent of the internet, there really is no reason why people can't have more input on legislation. Remember, congressmen act as representatives of the people for logistical reasons. Were voting allowed via internet, mail, or permanent polling places, the logistical roadblocks are reduced.
This country has an annoying quality where senators and representatives are elected and then inject their own personality into their voting. They are supposed to represent the people of their district. If 60% of the people in their district feel a certain way about an issue, why is the congressman/woman allowed to vote a different way? Why do their personal beliefs really matter at all? They are supposed to be voting the way their district wants regardless of what they personally believe.
I know, I know, things can be horribly complicated and the average person can't possibly understand all the issues they are voting on, but last I checked their is no intelligence requirement to be in the government...many people in governement now are dumb as a box of rocks. They don't have to be smart to be elected, they have to be personable and have good advisors working in the background.
Imagine being able to directly vote on education issues, warfare issues, and being able to prioritize budget items. Instead of blaming the morons in congress we would only be able to blame ourselves when things went horribly wrong. Of course, some form of standing governement would still be needed for a lot of reasons.
Again, I know the technology is not hot enough right now to provide the secruity that would be needed, etc, but it won't be long...
The Embargo Act. It is where the British would keep imoressing American sailors.