D:Evacuating victims from target areas
Answer:
Minutia such as this isn't worth the verbiage that is being devoted to it.
Explanation:
Not everything that might have an adverse effect is intentionally done. What we have here is over-concern, or hyper-concern, on the part of people who are looking for some way to shine with politically correct glory, forever trying to sniff out something that they can blame someone else for, even it that might be not trying hard enough to be progressive.
Quit it, already. Remember: get woke, go broke. On the other hand, if poverty is your thing, and joining the poor is what you want to do, go for it.
The correct answer is that she was probably<em> less sick than she says she was. </em>This is a perfect example of how our memory related to personal event changes over time to suit our present situation.
Answer:
Natural levees
Explanation:
These acts as a natural barrier between the storms and acts as a wall of defense, the Katrina type 3 tropical storm which occurred on the Gulf of Florida and placed more than 4 lakh people.
Hello. You did not present the experiment to which this question refers, which makes it impossible for it to be answered. However, I will try to help you in the best possible way.
It is likely that the amount of water presented in the question above is a variable in the experiment. This allows us to consider that if the experiment were carried out with different amounts of water, this experiment would provide inaccurate data and the results would not be considered true, making it impossible for a precise conclusion to be revealed.
This would happen because an experiment must distribute the variables, in all treatments, with the same amount and intensity. Therefore, to promote accurate data, the experiment must use an equal amount of water in all treatments.
