3 years ago

If a Supreme Court justice were to argue using a precedent, what might he or she do?

English

2 answers:

vladimir2022 [97]3 years ago

6 0

Answer: c

Explanation: apex

OleMash [197]3 years ago

3 0

If a supreme court justice were to argue using precedent, they would start by citing other cases that came to a similar conclusion. Because of what a previous court that ruled it would be relevant to the case at hand. This leads to precedent.

You might be interested in

Which of these sentences uses correct punctuation?

Anarel [89]

"In time, of course, all issues get resolved, but not necessarily in the way you would like."

3 0

3 years ago

Please help asap

Gemiola [76]

I believe it is Chronemics, as that is only definition that comes close to what you have put up. Please do let me know if it is correct.

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

2. To check the work on a problem, simply add the number to the subtracted number.

Kipish [7]

Answer:

the answer is subtraction

Explanation:

3 0

3 years ago

“They’s bad men,” Lemon Brown whispered

alexandr402 [8]

Answer: Lemon, says "bad men" she also says "they" meaning more the one bad man. Lemon is younger, or has a speech impediment. Lemon is also whispering, could this be a robbery?

3 0

3 years ago

_____ are types of changes that occur when text has been omitted from a document and must be inserted later. (Points : 2) Additi

hichkok12 [17]

The correct answer is additions - those are the types of changes that occur when text has been omitted from a document and must be inserted later.

8 0

3 years ago