Answer:
750 × 1/10 = 750/10 = 75
Step-by-step explanation:
The best way to really predict the outcome of multiplying 750 by 0.1 without calculator is firstly, converting the decimal to a fraction to easily do the multiplication in your head.
Since one of the multiplicand is a decimal the products will be much complicated therefore, to convert the decimal number 0.1 to a fraction number we shift the point to the right hand side which simply translate to 1/10. The trick here is the number of times we shift the point will determine the number of zeros the denominator will possess. Assuming we have 0.12 as the decimal, it is required we shift the point twice and the resulting value we become 12/100. If the decimal is 0.123 it is required we shift the point 3 times , the resulting value will be 123/1000. Not the number of times we shift the point will determine the number of zero's of the denominator.
Finally, the 2 multiplicands are now 750 and 1/10 which is more easier to manipulate in our head.
750 × 1/10 = 750/10 = 75( you just cancel the zeros)
Answer: Standard Deviation.
Step-by-step explanation:
DescriptionIn insights, the standard deviation is a proportion of the measure of variety or scattering of a lot of qualities. A low standard deviation demonstrates that the qualities will in general be near the mean of the set, while an elevated expectation deviation shows that the qualities are spread out over a more extensive territory.
Tangent is opposite side/ adjacent side
TanP = 5/12
Hope it helped!
To solve this problem, we must do a method of trial and error to find
for the next highest integer with exactly three factors. We know that the value
of k must be greater than 4, therefore by using trial and error to find for the
correct answer:
Factors of 5:1, 5
Factors of 6:1, 2, 3, 6
Factors of 7:1, 7
Factors of 8:1, 2, 4, 8
Factors of 9:1, 3, 9
Therefore we stop at 9 since this is already our answer. It has exactly
three factors.
The sum of the factors is:
sum of factors = 1 + 3 + 9
<span>sum of factors = 13</span>
Answer:
It looks like c
Step-by-step explanation:
I'm not completely sure bit i did this last year
