The Indian Removal Act took place in the first half of the 1800s under the presidencies of Andrew Jackson and Martin van Buren and directly led to the Trail of Tears, which resulted in the death of many members of tribes in the American South. It was considered controversial because the Supreme Court ruled in favor of the tribes' cause wherein the state of Georgia (which was actively seeking to evict the Indian inhabitants) was told it had no right to force their removal. Nevertheless, the president ordered their removal.
If one doesn't know how they are being traced, it could lead to various forms of distress and unrest. Take for example, the anxious person who enjoys baking. If they were anxious because they didn't know how they were being traced, they might start thinking their whisk was being used to trace them. This may then put the off baking altogether.
Answer: A. In extreme cases when the potential damage is clear and irreparable
Explanation: Hazardous materials that cause harm to the environment are regulated by laws, each of which is targeted at particular problems.
A concerned citizen has the right, granted by both state and federal laws, to sue any individual or organization responsible for a form of pollution to halt the activity causing the pollution.
In extreme cases and where there is evidence that the pollution will cause clear and irreparable damage, a judge may halt the action causing the pollution before a violation of the law has been proven in court.
Answer:
Comm as Transaction
Explanation:
Comm as Transaction -
It is the method of communication , where there is simultaneous exchange of message or information between the sender and the receiver, is referred to as comm as transaction.
In this method , the receiver and the sender , both are called the communicators , and the role of the of the sender and receiver change as the conversation starts .
Hence, from the given scenario of the question,
The correct term is Comm as Transaction .
I think the impact that "muckracking" had on Americans was this:
Due to the mishaps and the loss of trust that some Americans may have for their own, state, county, or even government that used some points of "muckracking" to begin. The best examples of "muckracking" in history can be accountable in today's day in age of the 21st Century. Now, for the most recent events on the other hands we could go on about lists and lists about things such as Donald Trump and Stormy Daniels and so on and so forth (But we won't talk about those begin again, this is only meant to answer your question, not bring up another :D but then again, we all differ from opinion) Now back to the point- I think that the best common examples of "muckracking' in today's society would be through celebrities and politicians. Many of the paparazzi try to capture celebrity photos, but also grab their opinions about things, but then twist and divert the story in a whole other way. But the same goes for politicians except using a different method. Anyways this is my opinion on how I see "muckracking" and how it has impacted Americans.
I hope my opinion and answer to your question was able to clear up some things. If you have any more questions about this or need another opinion on it- or if you simply just have another question that you would like to have answered, please check out my profile and I will be happy to do so. Again, I hope this was helpful to you, have a wonderful day! :)
